Back to top
Editor's blog

Under siege

9 Oct 18

After the extra money announced for prosecutors and then the police, something has to be done now for the defence sector

Warnings over the future of the criminal defence sector of the profession are not new. It is at least 15 years (a little before my time in post) since the Journal first flagged up the threat posed by the increasing age profile of defence solicitors, and the lack of new blood coming in.

Perhaps the political reaction then, if there was one at all, was, “It isn’t going to happen any time soon.” Now, in 2018, it surely is. As John Scott QC observes in our lead interview, many colleagues are still the ones he knew when starting out 30 years ago, now in their 60s or 70s. Worse, he and his peers feel unable even to advise those hoping to enter the profession to consider defence work. That from people who have dedicated their working lives to enabling justice to be seen to be done in the criminal courts.

Should that come as a surprise? Financially, defence lawyers have been squeezed for years and most can only operate by keeping overheads to an absolute minimum. The legal aid review passed the ticking parcel of what to do about rates back to the Government, which has yet to respond. Our employment survey, on p 16 of this issue, reveals that 90% have either had no increase in earnings, or in many cases taken a cut, in the past year, and even those of many years’ experience may be towards the foot of the earnings league. And as we also reported last month, they are the solicitors most at risk of violence, from clients or others, with many experiencing repeated incidents over the years.

Should policymakers need further evidence of where this may lead, they need look no further than England & Wales, where the Law Society predicts, with a “heatmap” in support, that due to the increasing age profile, in five to 10 years’ time many regions could have too few defence lawyers.

It should not need to be pointed out, though perhaps it does, that the decline in numbers, and career appeal, will not be easily or quickly reversed, given the time needed to qualify and gain experience. Surely it would also be more expensive to have public sector employees fill the gap?

In the past month or so we have had the announcement of a £3.6 million budget increase for the prosecution service to help it cope with its caseload, and a 6.5% pay rise for
the police. Neither of these are grudged, but is it not now screamingly obvious that something has to be done also for the third limb of the justice system, and fast?

 

Have your say

Blog archive

9 Oct 18

Under siege

After the extra money announced for prosecutors and then the police, something has to be done now for the defence sector

10 Sep 18

Programme for action?

How much can we expect to happen through the Scottish Government's Programme for Government?

6 Aug 18

No deal, no say?

The arguments for a second EU referendum apply with greater force in a "no deal" scenario

9 Jul 18

System under threat

Items in this month's issue illustrate increasing threats to the rule of law and the integrity of the legal system

11 Jun 18

Speaking out

The benefit sanctions system has drawn some unusually sharp comments from the Society, but the need for such strictures is likely to increase

8 May 18

After Windrush

The treatment of those of Caribbean origin shows a need for the law to be rebalanced

9 Apr 18

Mind the gap

Do the Gender Pay Gap Regulations provide enough useful information to justify their approach?

12 Mar 18

Case to be made

If the independent legal aid review could not find evidence to support a general rise in fees, what should the response be?

9 Feb 18

Crunch time

The independent reports due in the next few months will be an indication of how the profession is seen from outside

9 Jan 18

Hold tight for 2018

Get set for another rollercoaster ride through the year

4 Dec 17

Trends and revelations

From the Journal employment survey: sexual harassment must be taken seriously

9 Nov 17

Mergers and markets

After the Maclays-Dentons merger, what now for the independent Scottish legal firm?