Society blog

Talk of the town

8 Feb 12

Some thoughts against the background of the mergers dominating the legal news

2011 reflections

21 Dec 11

The economic outlook remains poor, but other developments await in the coming year

Offer them hope

2 Dec 11

Message needed for the young in troubled times

View from Wick

18 Oct 11

Austin Lafferty's faculty visit to Caithness

ABS lift-off

14 Oct 11

Society wants to share draft handbook with those interested in setting up in Scotland

2020 vision

23 Sep 11

Society's objectives set out for today's SGM

Conference call to action

8 Sep 11

"One Profession" event highlights opportunities in the years ahead

Discrimination: bad for business

1 Jun 11

Society will lead in tackling negative perceptions of the profession by ethnic minority solicitors

Dealing with the new Parliament

12 May 11

Society wants to continue constructive relationship in dealing with legal issues

The AGM and the constitution

17 Mar 11

The constitution could do with updating even as regards participation in the meeting

Editors Blog

Surveillance without frontiers?

16 Oct 08
Phone and email database proposals surely go too far

It is not just civil libertarians who are alarmed by the Westminster Government's proposal to build a massive database containing records of all phone and email communicatons and website traffic, accessible by the police and other public authorities. Opposition descriptions of the plan as "Orwellian" and an "exponential increase" in state powers are not as exaggerated as such political reaction often is.

Granted, it is the details of the traffic and not the content of the messages that would be kept. Granted also, the purpose is to combat terrorism and other serious crime and the Government believes that the increasingly sophisticated use by criminals of state-of-the-art forms of communication justifies a sweeping response. But mishaps with publicly held data are legion, and even if this were not so, can the collection of such a vast quantity of data be justified in order to target such a very small number of individuals?

One wonders whether such blanket measures are really likely to be effective. The powers already exist to monitor particular individuals, and are carefully controlled. The limits of legitimate surveillance are being stretched all the time. If we have not reached breaking point with this plan, will we ever?

Have your say





FILLER_lawscotjobs (link opens in new window)