Society blog

Talk of the town

8 Feb 12

Some thoughts against the background of the mergers dominating the legal news

2011 reflections

21 Dec 11

The economic outlook remains poor, but other developments await in the coming year

Offer them hope

2 Dec 11

Message needed for the young in troubled times

View from Wick

18 Oct 11

Austin Lafferty's faculty visit to Caithness

ABS lift-off

14 Oct 11

Society wants to share draft handbook with those interested in setting up in Scotland

2020 vision

23 Sep 11

Society's objectives set out for today's SGM

Conference call to action

8 Sep 11

"One Profession" event highlights opportunities in the years ahead

Discrimination: bad for business

1 Jun 11

Society will lead in tackling negative perceptions of the profession by ethnic minority solicitors

Dealing with the new Parliament

12 May 11

Society wants to continue constructive relationship in dealing with legal issues

The AGM and the constitution

17 Mar 11

The constitution could do with updating even as regards participation in the meeting

Editors Blog

Sauce for the gander?

22 Oct 08
What is the consumer view of a ban on commercial medical practices?

The odd legal eyebrow may be raised by today's Scottish Government announcement of a consultation on proposals to ban commercial interests from owning general medical practices.

We are told that this is to further the Government's vision of a mutual NHS underpinned by the values of public service, and to underpin public confidence in the advice and treatment offered.

In the legal profession, of course, we are just beginning to live with the idea that availability and quality of service, public benefits such as access to justice, and the consumer ideal of a choice of competing services, should be maximised by just such a freedom. Of course, unlike medical practices, legal firms are not part of a state-run service. On the other hand, as I understand it, the policy for some time has been to encourage an internal market within the NHS in order to control costs.

So where does the consumer lobby stand on this one? Wouldn't it make sense to encourage a free market in order to improve choice and quality? Why should doctors any more than lawyers feel themselves under pressure to tailor their advice according to the interests of outside shareholders? Will we see a Which? super-complaint to the OFT if this proposal goes through? I think we should be told.

FILLER_lawscotjobs (link opens in new window)