Society blog

2011 reflections

21 Dec 11

The economic outlook remains poor, but other developments await in the coming year

Offer them hope

2 Dec 11

Message needed for the young in troubled times

View from Wick

18 Oct 11

Austin Lafferty's faculty visit to Caithness

ABS lift-off

14 Oct 11

Society wants to share draft handbook with those interested in setting up in Scotland

2020 vision

23 Sep 11

Society's objectives set out for today's SGM

Conference call to action

8 Sep 11

"One Profession" event highlights opportunities in the years ahead

Discrimination: bad for business

1 Jun 11

Society will lead in tackling negative perceptions of the profession by ethnic minority solicitors

Dealing with the new Parliament

12 May 11

Society wants to continue constructive relationship in dealing with legal issues

The AGM and the constitution

17 Mar 11

The constitution could do with updating even as regards participation in the meeting

Journey of discovery

25 Feb 11

Council awayday session explores strategy for the way ahead

Editors Blog

Legal aid - at a price

10 Apr 09
Extended civil eligibility is no giveaway

Much was made by the Scottish Government this week of the extended eligibility for civil legal aid, in force from Tuesday past (7 April).

Upper disposable income limit up from £10,306 to £25,000; 1,000,000 more Scots now qualify, taking in three quarters of the adult population. So ran the press release, the figures being duly picked up by most of the newspapers.

Any extension is of course welcome, and a contrast to the standstill approach (or worse) that has prevailed for many years. But not so many looked at the figures further down the release, on the contributions that will be demanded from those applying. 

While those with disposable incomes above £3,355 (the threshold for paying a contribution) will be assessed at a figure equivalent to a third of the excess up to £10,995, the proportion rises to 50% for the next slice of income up to £15,000, and a full 100% on the balance up to £25,000. Thus someone with a disposable income just on the upper limit will be asked for a payment of £14,549 before they get any help from the state. (For someone on £20,000 disposable, the figure would be £9,549, and on £15,000, £4,549.)

Of course in many cases the costs of litigation could substantially exceed even the maximum contribution, and we appreciate the strains on the public finances at present, but a 100% clawback on a full £10,000 income band does seem a bit steep, even on extended payment terms.

Will it do much to halt the decline in takeup of civil legal aid over the past decade and more? That remains to be seen. I trust the statistics will be made available as soon as possible to indicate how many have taken advantage of their new entitlement, and a proper assessment undertaken of whether it has made a substantial difference to people seeking to translate their legal rights into real results.

Have your say






Your comment

Richard L Russell

Friday April 17, 2009, 10:58

Dear Sir,

I am disgusted by the legal profession in this country in so far as a single father with 3 small children can not get proper legal representation in this country.

Solicitors just seem more interested in cashing in on my legal status income support by asking me to sign A&A forms, then saying, the case is too complex!

So why work as a lawyer then? I ask myself?

I even wrote to SLAB myself asking them not to pay a firm because the legal advice I obtained from them was so bad, it defied belief.

The overwhelming question is, what will be done to help socially isolated families obtain proper legal representation.

Yours sincerely

Richard L. Russell


FILLER_lawscotjobs (link opens in new window)