Society blog

Talk of the town

8 Feb 12

Some thoughts against the background of the mergers dominating the legal news

2011 reflections

21 Dec 11

The economic outlook remains poor, but other developments await in the coming year

Offer them hope

2 Dec 11

Message needed for the young in troubled times

View from Wick

18 Oct 11

Austin Lafferty's faculty visit to Caithness

ABS lift-off

14 Oct 11

Society wants to share draft handbook with those interested in setting up in Scotland

2020 vision

23 Sep 11

Society's objectives set out for today's SGM

Conference call to action

8 Sep 11

"One Profession" event highlights opportunities in the years ahead

Discrimination: bad for business

1 Jun 11

Society will lead in tackling negative perceptions of the profession by ethnic minority solicitors

Dealing with the new Parliament

12 May 11

Society wants to continue constructive relationship in dealing with legal issues

The AGM and the constitution

17 Mar 11

The constitution could do with updating even as regards participation in the meeting

Editors Blog

All quiet on the western front?

25 Mar 10
SGM adjourns for talks: could we see consensus yet?

So jaw-jaw could yet be better than war-war. Against expectations, the Society's Special General Meeting today agreed to an adjournment for talks between the Law Society of Scotland and the Scottish Law Agents Society, who requisitioned the meeting, to see whether a basis could be found for an agreed way forward.

At the moment we can only speculate what the focus of the talks will be, although the nature and level of regulation is one possibility. During the preceding debate, which lacked nothing in the weight of the points made on both sides, supporters of the SLAS position spoke not only of their concerns for professional independence under ABS but of the lack of clarity that continues to surround the proposed regulatory model.

What was most welcome, however, was the absence of the rancour that has featured in much of the published media comment in recent weeks. Welcome not only to me, I think – as the debate went on, a theme began to emerge of the desirability of preserving, indeed the need to preserve, a united profession. Small firms tempted to say let the big boys move down south if that's what they want to do, were reminded of the consequences for Master Policy and Guarantee Fund premiums without the contributions of their big cousins. And all would suffer, it was said, if the profession was seen to be weak in its dealings with Government and the Parliament.

And while President Ian Smart said that Council's objective, and its difficulty, was in keeping solicitors as one profession, he accepted that it might have been over eager at times and that SLAS "might have done us a favour" in delivering a kick to a sensitive area.

The bigger picture, and the views as to whether there is a future in ABS, may not have changed that much – yet – but for the moment at least we no longer have a profession that is in danger of tearing itself apart (these are others' words before the debate, not mine). That should give some cause for optimism.

Have your say






Your comment

Mike Lloyd

Saturday March 27, 2010, 16:25

Why has the Journal not reported on the Da Vinci trial, especially in relation to those parts of the evidence that involved the Law Society members who stand accused? Many within the profession are surprised at this. I'm not, though!


Peter Nicholson

Monday March 29, 2010, 08:47

The Journal normally reports the outcomes of trials involving members of the profession but does not maintain day-by-day coverage of proceedings.


FILLER_lawscotjobs (link opens in new window)