Society blog

Talk of the town

8 Feb 12

Some thoughts against the background of the mergers dominating the legal news

2011 reflections

21 Dec 11

The economic outlook remains poor, but other developments await in the coming year

Offer them hope

2 Dec 11

Message needed for the young in troubled times

View from Wick

18 Oct 11

Austin Lafferty's faculty visit to Caithness

ABS lift-off

14 Oct 11

Society wants to share draft handbook with those interested in setting up in Scotland

2020 vision

23 Sep 11

Society's objectives set out for today's SGM

Conference call to action

8 Sep 11

"One Profession" event highlights opportunities in the years ahead

Discrimination: bad for business

1 Jun 11

Society will lead in tackling negative perceptions of the profession by ethnic minority solicitors

Dealing with the new Parliament

12 May 11

Society wants to continue constructive relationship in dealing with legal issues

The AGM and the constitution

17 Mar 11

The constitution could do with updating even as regards participation in the meeting

Society Blog

Taking concerns seriously

29 May 09
The Society must be seen to be listening to, and working for, its members following the support shown at yesterday's AGM

Twice in two days I have sat at the top table among a gathering of my fellow solicitors – yesterday as Vice President of the Society at our annual general meeting; today before Council members on my first day as President. As might be expected from a roomful of lawyers, both occasions involved lively debate.

The AGM attracted particular attention, largely due to a motion proposing the practising certificate should be reduced to £400. Needless to say, such a suggestion posed a serious threat to the continuing viability of the Society in its current form. Thankfully, it was convincingly rejected – both by delegates present and when the proxy votes were counted – in favour of a Society amendment seeking a “material reduction” in the PC fee. It was particularly reassuring that the votes in favour of the Society’s position came from the length and breadth of the profession, and the country, rather than simply relying on the support of the big firms, as had been suggested may be the case.

But, while the Society comprehensively won the debate as well as the vote, the issues raised by the PC motion must be taken seriously. Our regulatory role – and its value to the public – is generally well understood, even if its worth to the solicitor brand is not always fully appreciated. Our representative role less so. And in that sense, the motion on the PC fee contained a kernel of truth. The work we do on behalf of our membership must be refined and more clearly articulated. For that reason, one of the key objectives of my presidency is to “sell” the value added element of what the Society does – particularly the non-statutory functions – to solicitors. In doing so, I hope we can retain – and where necessary, regain – the respect and trust of our members and the public in Scotland.

The Society is in the midst of a process of change, as was again debated at today’s meeting of the Council. That process should now be allowed to run its course. In 12 months, when I reflect on my term as President, my aim is that the Society will be recognisably more modern, effective, efficient and responsive. I welcome feedback from all concerned along the way.

Finally, the Society was immensely fortunate 21 months ago that Richard Henderson was in a position to take up the presidency of the Society. As vice president, I have been equally fortunate to benefit from his wise counsel. It is now my responsibility to build on his significant achievements.

Ian Smart is President of the Law Society of Scotland
 

Have your say





FILLER_lawscotjobs (link opens in new window)