Society blog

Talk of the town

8 Feb 12

Some thoughts against the background of the mergers dominating the legal news

2011 reflections

21 Dec 11

The economic outlook remains poor, but other developments await in the coming year

Offer them hope

2 Dec 11

Message needed for the young in troubled times

View from Wick

18 Oct 11

Austin Lafferty's faculty visit to Caithness

ABS lift-off

14 Oct 11

Society wants to share draft handbook with those interested in setting up in Scotland

2020 vision

23 Sep 11

Society's objectives set out for today's SGM

Conference call to action

8 Sep 11

"One Profession" event highlights opportunities in the years ahead

Discrimination: bad for business

1 Jun 11

Society will lead in tackling negative perceptions of the profession by ethnic minority solicitors

Dealing with the new Parliament

12 May 11

Society wants to continue constructive relationship in dealing with legal issues

The AGM and the constitution

17 Mar 11

The constitution could do with updating even as regards participation in the meeting

Society Blog

Positive vibes from our MSPs

4 May 10
Legal Services Bill stage 1 debate recognised the Society's positive contribution to the process

Uncertain exactly what to expect, I took my seat in the Holyrood public gallery on Wednesday for my first live Scottish parliamentary debate, prosaically listed as motion S3M-6168. To you and me, the conclusion of stage 1 of the Legal Services (Scotland) Bill. I left the main chamber two hours later reassured by a cross-party vote of confidence in the Society – and clear that parliamentarians shared all our hopes that a way forward was needed on alternative business structures.

The minister responsible for the bill, Fergus Ewing, set the tone when he opened the debate by acknowledging the Society’s positive contribution to the legislative process, while also noting that at times a constructive discussion risked turning into an “unedifying stramash”. In further exchanges, MSPs from across the political spectrum recognised our respect for democratic processes, the various attempts we have made to gather the views of solicitors, the quality of our evidence and the role the Society has played in putting forward amendments, for instance in relation to the independence of the profession.

A couple of contributors highlighted support for our dual regulatory and representative role, also drawing attention to the decisive vote in the recent referendum in favour of the Society applying to be a regulator of ABSs if they are introduced.

The reference to the Society experiencing a “torrid” time as people got to grips with the bill was also no understatement. It has been difficult for our members to reach a unifying settled will on ABS but it has also been an unsettling time for our staff. This has proved hard work for us all, but we have remained committed to engaging with our members at every opportunity and finding common ground where possible.

Bearing that in mind, perhaps the last word should go to Justice Committee Convener Bill Aitken. In both recognising the sincere differences within the profession and urging a spirit of compromise and conciliation, he paid tribute to Society President Ian Smart for putting his head above the parapet in providing leadership to the profession.

I second that motion.

Lorna Jack is Chief Executive of the Law Society of Scotland

 

Have your say





FILLER_lawscotjobs (link opens in new window)