News In Focus

14 December 2006

£60,000 compensation for coffee machine fall

A faulty coffee machine has led to a kitchen assistant being awarded more than £60,000 in damages for breaking her hip and wrist in a fall.

Helen Given was working in the canteen at James Watt College, Greenock, when, she claimed, the machine started to hiss, spurt out jets of steam and then gave out a sudden electrical flash that had caused the 61-year-old to take a step back and fall over.

She claimed that the machine had a history of breaking down and engineers had been called out repeatedly to fix it, and that the college should have taken it out of service.

In an opinion issued at the Court of Session yesterday, Lord Emslie accepted Mrs Given's account.

The judge conceded that he had initially held doubts about Mrs Given's version as he had not been able to imagine someone falling so badly as a result of stepping back from an electrical flash. However on balance he was prepared to accept her evidence as accurate.

"Truth is, as the saying goes, often stranger than fiction, and in the whole circumstances I am ultimately unable to say that the pursuer's account of the incident is either impossible, or so inherently improbable that it simply cannot be accepted", he said.

"People do sometimes unaccountably lose their balance or footing in circumstances where they would not normally be expected to fall, and a sudden fright must obviously increase the risk of unexpected consequences."

Lord Emslie said that the manageress, Miss Ritchie, had "very fairly and frankly admitted that she could and should have done more than she did to ensure the safety of people like the pursuer who had to work in close proximity to the machine", and the college could therefore not escape a finding of negligence.

Mrs Given was awarded £30,500 in damages for loss of earnings, £20,000 for pain and suffering and £5,000 for the help provided to her by her husband after she left hospital. Adding the interest to the total, Mrs Given was awarded £60,426.

Lord Emslie's opinion can be read at http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2006CSOH189.html .

News reel

Bail law held ultra vires

8 Feb 12

Condition requiring participation in ID parade infringes ECHR

Latest Society constitution plans out for views

8 Feb 12

Six-week period for responses ahead of proposed AGM vote

Brodies appoints two new partners

8 Feb 12

Firm recruits agricultural property and private client specialists

Unfair dismissal claim can be brought for work abroad

8 Feb 12

Supreme Court upholds worker's right to bring tribnal case

Human Rights Court upholds press freedoms

8 Feb 12

European judges reject privacy claims in German cases

Report backs press regulation

7 Feb 12

Carnegie UK Trust calls for independent regulator and code of ethics

New social housing powers outlined

7 Feb 12

Plans to prioritise needy and tackle antisocial behaviour

Ministers pledge procurement improvements

6 Feb 12

Review will seek to maximise openings for home-based businesses

McGrigors and Pinsents confirm merger

6 Feb 12

McGrigors name to disappear as partners approve plans

Planning rules eased

6 Feb 12

New regime aims to remove 4,000 applications per year

Society warns over HSBC mortgage documentation

6 Feb 12

Scottish borrowers' solicitors "should decline to engage"

Lord Reed sworn in at UK Supreme Court today

6 Feb 12

Court joins Twitter to mark the occasion

FILLER_lawscotjobs (link opens in new window)