News In Focus

5 March 2010

Court confirms ruling against tobacco minimum prices

Minimum prices for tobacco introduced by France, Ireland and Austria are an illegal infringement of competition under European law, the European Court ruled yesterday.

Judges affirmed an earlier opinion of the Advocate General that the laws in the three countries were incompatible with the Tobacco Duty Directive 95/59/EC. This obliges member states to impose excise duty on cigarettes calculated partly on the maximum selling price and partly by reference to cigarettes in the most popular price category.

The court agreed with the Commission, which brought the complaint, that the minimum pricing rules meant that the maximum price could not be lower than that minimum and were therefore capable of undermining competition. It concluded that the rules could not be regarded as compatible with the directive unless "structured in such a way as to ensure, in any event, that the competitive advantage which could result for some manufacturers and importers of those products from lower cost prices is not impaired".

Although all three countries advanced public health reason to justify their laws, the court said that the directive did not prevent member states from combating smoking because fiscal legislation was "an important and effective instrument" for discouraging tobacco consumption. And the law did not prevent member states from banning the sale of tobacco at a loss, "so long as the freedom of manufacturers or importers to determine the maximum retail selling prices for their products is not undermined".

The Scotch Whisky Association called on the Scottish Government to "recognise the legal realities" and abandon its plans for minimum alcohol pricing in the light of the judgment. However the Government maintains that the legal regimes governing tobacco and alcohol are different and the decision does not necessarily affect alcohol pricing.

Click here for a Journal article on the legal issues involved.

Click here to view the European Court's decisions in the three cases.


Have your say





News reel

Ministers pledge procurement improvements

6 Feb 12

Review will seek to maximise openings for home-based businesses

McGrigors and Pinsents confirm merger

6 Feb 12

McGrigors name to disappear as partners approve plans

Planning rules eased

6 Feb 12

New regime aims to remove 4,000 applications per year

Society warns over HSBC mortgage documentation

6 Feb 12

Scottish borrowers' solicitors "should decline to engage"

Lord Reed sworn in at UK Supreme Court today

6 Feb 12

Court joins Twitter to mark the occasion

Call for evidence on MSP code of practice

3 Feb 12

Conduct in the chamber, lobbying and enforcement rules up for debate

Six receive Signet Accreditation

3 Feb 12

Awards made in commercial property, commercial litigation, and employment

High Hedges Bill moves forward

3 Feb 12

Mark McDonald MSP wields shears on unruly neighbours

Appeal judges uphold tobacco sales Act

2 Feb 12

Restrictions on display of products not beyond Holyrood's competence

Ledingham Chalmers branches into Stirling

2 Feb 12

North east firm targets central Scotland

Dundas & Wilson to open in Aberdeen

2 Feb 12

Initial focus will be on corporate work

Commons reverses Lords defeats on welfare reforms

2 Feb 12

Original bill proposals restored despite protests

FILLER_lawscotjobs (link opens in new window)