Back to top
News In Focus

Sheriff’s domestic abuse comments spark storm

6 August 2010

Sheriff Kevin Drummond has sparked a row over the role of the sheriff’s court in dealing with domestic abuse cases, after commenting that some were too trivial for the court’s attention. He went on to characterise the Crown Office’s policy of bringing all such cases before a sheriff as a “grave wrong”.

The comments were made following a case in which Marek Maikut was accused of assaulting his partner Katrina Hall – who he has since married – during an argument about pictures found on his mobile phone. Hall subsequently asked for the charges to be dropped.

Sheriff Drummond said: "Domestic assault is a serious offence which deserves to be dealt with seriously.

"But some cases of the most trivial nature, which under normal circumstances would barely justify being brought in a justice of the peace court, are routinely being brought in sheriff courts.

"It is a grave wrong for any court to deal with any person appearing before it exclusively on the basis of a pre-determined policy - that is to prejudge, and that is the root of prejudice."

These words drew swift criticism from several quarters, including Scottish Labour’s community safety spokesman, James Kelly, who underlined the “gravity” of domestic abuse cases and highlighted the additional powers of the sheriff to protect victims of abuse.

The Crown Office also vigorously defended its policy, arguing the weight of the sheriff’s court was necessary to ensure domestic abuse cases were dealt with “sensitively, effectively and in the public interest."

Have your say

Your comment

Mrs Gannon

Friday May 13, 2011, 22:37

I guess those who do not agree with Sheriff Drummond have likely never read the criteria for domestic abuse on the Women's Aid website where it is stated if you have experienced any of the above you are a victim. The criteria are very wide and range from anything said in the heat of a disagreement to that which can be considered as abusive. It is wide open to misuse by anyone wanting to 'get rid' of a partner. It appears also that there is no shortage of end of the road organisations all too willing to help them do so. Sheriff Drummond is right and just how can it be a one size fits all penalty for that which is difficult to prove and has very varied criteria.