News In Focus

13 December 2011

ESTO directors deny improper actings

The directors of a new venture offering to relieve criminal defence solicitors of the burden of advising suspects detained in police stations, have denied making improper use of information gained in negotiations with the legal aid authorities.

Launched yesterday with the aim of being operational in January once solicitors have been recruited and trained, ESTO Law Ltd has been formed as a company with seven directors, five of whom served until recently on the Law Society of Scotland's Legal Aid Negotiating Team (LANT) dealing with criminal legal aid.

The five are John Scott QC (Edinburgh), Ian Bryce (Livingston), Ken Dalling (Stirling), Vincent McGovern (Hamilton) and Stuart Munro (Glasgow). The other directors are Neil Robertson, a partner of Ian Bryce, and John Keenan, a partner of John Scott.

ESTO offers defence solicitors liable to be called out to police stations at any hour, a means of outsourcing this work without losing the client for any subsequent proceedings. It undertakes that its role will conclude once the police station work has been reported on to the instructing solicitor and to the Scottish Legal Aid Board. "This should relieve you of the pressure of providing out of hours advice, while offering reassurance that your clients are being well advised and will not be lost to you", its launch document promises.

Mr Scott told the Journal that he did not expect ESTO's business model to be affected by the next round of legal aid cuts, with subsumption (the proposed inclusion of the fee for this advice within the fixed fee for summary criminal cases) having just been dropped by the Government in the face of opposition from the profession.

"So far as geographical spread goes," he added, "we will obviously deal with phone calls from any police station. As for visits we hope to have cover in the central belt, and possibly Dundee and Aberdeen." If videoconferencing technology was adopted as the Scottish Government and SLAB appeared to hope, coverage could be further extended. He and his colleagues are interviewing candidates, "many of whom have been unable to find jobs or have just left other positions".

Glasgow solicitors have reacted with hostility and suspicion, some accusing the former LANT members of using "insider information" to develop the ESTO model, or of paving the way for criminal legal aid franchising in Scotland - a model opposed by the profession. However the ESTO directors have insisted that all the information on which they based their venture has been available to the whole profession, and that the concern had been "overblown".


Have your say






Your comment

Kenneth Waddell

Tuesday December 13, 2011, 19:55

It appears that Esto are also able to have their sales pitch repeated in the Journal! What about some comment from the Law Society about their part in discussions leading up to the formation of this company? Is that really too much to expect? Solicitors in several jurisdictions are expressing some concerns (and disbelief) over the actions of the 4 former LANT members. Those 4 negotiated with SLAB and the Government on behalf of the profession during the last round of legal aid budget cuts. Those of us who were not consulted in any way by those 4 during their deliberations and negotiations are still suffering financially as a result. Their abject failure to even minute the meetings or take notes of what they had agreed (or not agreed) will no doubt be a formula they will not follow in their new venture. If the 4 think matters are being "overblown" it perhaps gives an insight into their inability to gauge the reaction of their fellow solicitors to their actions; something they should have been aware of after the unpopular proposals that they made on behalf of a profession that they did not even consult.


Editor

Thursday December 15, 2011, 08:47

A comment by Ian Smart can be read on the Forum page: www.journalonline.co.uk/Referendum/1010609.aspx


vincent mc govern

Thursday January 19, 2012, 14:51

As one of "those 4" so politely described by Kenneth Waddell, as a reference to our involvement in the LANT during the 2010-11 legal aid budget cuts, I require to clarify his reference to "those of us who were not consulted".

He cannot be referring to himself given his attendance on 22 December at the meeting of Faculty representatives to consult upon the issue. This meeting followed correspondence to all solicitors registered for criminal law assistance and separate correspondence to Faculty "heads" on the issue. Mr Waddell would have received this as the then President of the GBA. To clarify further a report on the whole budget cut process is available on the LSS website.

Whilst the timescale for consultation was short through no fault on the part of the LSS, Mr Waddell along with many others made an active contribution at this meeting.

No one disputes the cuts were painful but let's not distort what actually happened. That is something "those 4" have never tried to do.


News reel

One week left in SLAS survey on lender rules

22 Feb 12

Solicitors called on to give their view on conflict rules change

High Court limits effect of bail decision

22 Feb 12

Finding of statute invalidity not to apply to concluded cases

Legal moves in Glasgow Chamber of Commerce

22 Feb 12

Solicitors among board and director appointments

Crerar to chair Highlands & Islands Enterprise

22 Feb 12

Harper Macleod chairman to head development body

Debt arrangement scheme promotion launched

21 Feb 12

Six week campaign to publicise alternative to bankruptcy

Nimmo Smith to chair Rangers inquiry

21 Feb 12

Former judge to "inquire independently" on behalf of SFA

Ministers announce money for rural community buyouts

21 Feb 12

Scottish Land Fund will promote community ownership

Two new sheriff appointments

21 Feb 12

Derek Hamilton and Peter Paterson elevated to bench

Angiolini to become Oxford principal

20 Feb 12

Former Lord Advocate to join college founded to promote women's education

Wilson lecture new date confirmed

20 Feb 12

Postponed 2011 event to take place on 7 March

Which? takes up HSBC panel issue

20 Feb 12

Concerns expressed over choice and competition

Brodies adds again to Aberdeen team

20 Feb 12

Energy partner and corporate associate bring office strength to 30

FILLER_lawscotjobs (link opens in new window)