Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal
Reports relating to Donald Stewart Duncan; Michael Charles Gray; Marie Angelo Land
The Journal, August 2004, page 57
DONALD STEWART DUNCAN
A Complaint was made by the Council of the Law Society of Scotland against Donald Stewart Duncan, Solicitor, Sit-ma-lain, Bowriefauld, by Forfar (“the Respondent”). The Tribunal found the Respondent guilty of professional misconduct in respect of his overcharging fees in the winding up of an executry estate and his failure to render a fee note to a client and failure to gain written authority from a client to debit the ledger account of an executry estate contrary to rule 6(1)(d) of the Solicitors (Scotland) Accounts Rules 1997. The Tribunal ordered that the name of the Respondent be struck off the Roll of Solicitors in Scotland.The Tribunal were gravely concerned by the Respondent’s actions. A solicitor acting in the winding up of an executry has a professional duty to ensure that, when taking interim fees from funds held by him for work carried out during the course of winding up, these fees are in all the circumstances a reasonable estimate of and fairly reflect the work actually carried out at the time that the interim fee is taken. It is the duty of a solicitor not to overcharge fees to a client, particularly where the solicitor is in the possession of funds which enable him to take these fees.
In the absence of any explanation provided by the Respondent, the Tribunal found that the overcharging of fees was either wilful or grossly reckless. This taken together with the failure to obtain authority from a client to debit a ledger account with fees and also taking into account a previous finding of misconduct against the Respondent, led the Tribunal to conclude that it had no option but to strike the Respondent’s name from the Roll of Solicitors in Scotland.
MICHAEL CHARLES GRAY
A Complaint was made by the Council of the Law Society of Scotland against Michael Charles Gray, Solicitor, 115 Morrison Street, Edinburgh (“the Respondent”). The Tribunal found the Respondent guilty of professional misconduct in respect of his failure to respond timeously, openly and accurately to the reasonable enquiries made of him by the Law Society of Scotland and his failure to act in accordance with article 7 of the Code of Conduct for Solicitors Holding Practising Certificates issued by the Law Society of Scotland in 1989 by causing or permitting to be published, an advert in the Yellow Pages which was deliberately inaccurate or misleading. The Tribunal Censured the Respondent and Fined him in the sum of £3,000. The Tribunal also found that the Respondent had failed to comply with the Determinations and Directions given by the Council of the Law Society of Scotland under section 42A of the Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1980 within the periods specified and Directed that four orders be issued under section 53C of the said Act.The Respondent was not present or represented at the hearing. The Tribunal was satisfied that the Respondent had received the Complaint and noted that he had chosen not to lodge answers and to go on holiday without advising the Tribunal. The Tribunal proceeded in the absence of the Respondent. The Tribunal was particularly concerned by the placing of the advert in the Yellow Pages by the Respondent, which suggested that his firm was competent to provide professional advice on matters of English law when the Respondent was not a qualified English lawyer. The placing of the advert in the Yellow Pages clearly gave the Respondent’s firm a competitive advantage and the Tribunal found that it was deliberately inaccurate and misleading in that it suggested that the Respondent’s firm was competent to provide professional advice on matters of English law when the Respondent knew that his firm was not competent to do so. The Tribunal was also concerned by the Respondent’s failure to reply to the Law Society of Scotland in connection with various complaints. The Tribunal noted that the Respondent had already had his practising certificate restricted for a period of 10 years on 29 May 2003 and the Tribunal was of a view that the public would be protected by the restriction already imposed. However, in view of the serious view the Tribunal took of the Respondent’s misleading advert, the Tribunal imposed a further fine of £3,000.
MARIE ANGELO LAND
A Complaint was made by the Council of the Law Society of Scotland against Marie Angelo Land, Solicitor, 29 Nicolson Street, Greenock (“the Respondent”). The Tribunal found the Respondent guilty of professional misconduct in respect of her failure to respond timeously or at all to the reasonable enquiries made of her by the Law Society of Scotland concerning the affairs of a client and her failure to produce files relating to the complaint despite being served with formal notices. The Tribunal Censured the Respondent and imposed a fine of £1,000.The Tribunal has made it clear on a number of occasions that it takes a serious view of failure to respond to the Society. Failure to respond hampers the Society in the performance of its statutory duty and is likely to bring the profession into disrepute. In this case a lot of letters and notices were sent to the Respondent and no satisfactory reply was forthcoming. The Respondent also left it to the last minute to get representation before the Tribunal to fully answer the Complaint. It is clear that the Respondent is an experienced professional and should have known how important it is to comply with her professional obligations and to respond to enquiries from the Society. The Tribunal however took into account the fact that the Respondent had eventually entered into a joint minute and had a previously clean record.
Current Issue FeaturesBraving the stormHow different types of legal firm are coping with the current economic downturn, and how they see their future Civil justice: where next?An abridged version of the keynote address delivered to the conference on civil justice held in Edinburgh on 20 June Title Conditions Act: new registration proceduresNew procedures are in place for deeds intended to create new real burdens, to assist solicitors in complying with the requirement for dual registration Young lawyers rebornInterview with Scottish Young Lawyers Association President Maryam Labaki on SYLA's ambitions as it relaunches Shining some more light...Second part of overview of this year's Finance Act looks at the provisions on savings, pensions, residence/domicile and business taxes, among others Power to the tribunal?An advocate's and a solicitor's views of how the Scottish Government's proposed reforms to arbitration law might work in practice Piece by pieceA progress report from England & Wales on the setting up of the complex regulatory machinery under the Legal Services Act 2007 The poor in our midstInterview with Scottish Solicitors' Benevolent Fund convener Craig Bennet, who aims to raise awareness of the Fund so it can provide more help to those in need Current Issue ArticlesShifting sandsPresident's message: with economic issues dominating the profession's thoughts, the Society is taking steps to provide advice and support to those in need A rank bad ruleOpinion by two advocates that the Faculty's response to the OFT does its members a disservice by defending the cab rank rule and by resisting the use of ABS The Society's future role in complaints handlingA reminder, in the light of reactions to the first levy issued on behalf of the new Complaints Commission, of when and how the Society's responsibilities are changing Appreciation: Lord JohnstonReport of the tribute paid in court by the Lord President Professional Practice CommitteeNew guidelines on acting as a company director; and document control and file tracking Facing the lean yearsSome advice on how to pull through a recession and be ready for the next upturn, as word goes round of legal firms looking at staff cuts and other measures (part 1 of 2) It's a web 2.0 worldThe interactive nature of web 2.0 technology presents business opportunities, while posing new risks for those with inadequate precautions as to employee internet use Questions, questionsIn reviewing their risk profiles and risk controls, all firms might benefit from conducting a self-assessment by addressing questions put by some insurers elsewhere Bare necessitiesLatest criminal cases, including offensive weapons; Moorov rule; withdrawal of representation; evidence of a deceased; contempt of court by solicitor Coming on the blind sideA technical-sounding consultation, currently open for comments, covers some significant aspects of dispute resolution in employment Relocation, relocationA recent decision explores the matters to consider when one parent wants to relocate abroad along with their child Worse than the disease?Has the UK quietly outlawed "alternative" medicine through the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations? Sleeping bountyThe Scottish Community Foundation has a scheme to breathe new life into dormant charitable trusts Scottish Solicitors' Discipline TribunalReports relating to Eileen Agnes Coogans; Zosia Marion Elizabeth Fraser; Annaline Webster; Ian Samuel Gerard Donnelly; Mark David Sheppard Website reviewsReviews of sites of organisations concerned with domain name disputes Book reviewsReview of Child and Family Law (Sutherland) Industry standardA survey south of the border suggests that in-house work in commerce and industry doesn't always match expectations - but most in-house lawyers expect to stay Meet the committeeProfile of In-house Lawyers Group committee member Sara Scott What's in a motto?A sample of In-house Lawyers Group members' notarial mottoes, collected by ILG secretary Tricia Sim Leasing by example"Green leases" appear to be some way off yet for the UK, but a Canadian model now published shows how they might work Good call?Reply to article questioning the Donald Trump planning application call-in argues that the decision is both competent and consistent with proper operation of the system Home reports - the practice questionsOpen letter over reservations as to the Society's proposed guidelines on the operation of home reports, in so far as they deal with conflict of interest |