The Journal, July 2004, page 58
Part 2 of the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 (“the Act”) came into force on 14 June 2004. A new Register, the Register of Community Interests in Land (“RCIL”), also came into being. This article highlights key features of the new Register, with reference to the registration of the rights of community bodies in terms of the Act, and provides guidance on the effect of such registrations on subsequent transactions.
Information regarding Part 2 of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003, which creates a distinct part of the Register for registrations relating to secure agricultural tenancies, will be dealt with separately in future publications.
Section 36 of the Act provides that the Keeper is to set up and keep the new Register. The Register will contain specified items of information and copy documents and is required to be available for inspection, free of charge, at all reasonable times. A community interest entered on the Register has effect for a period of five years from the date of registration.
Part 2 of the Act provides for a community right to buy rural land, as such is defined by subordinate legislation. Applications by community bodies, as defined in the Act, must be made on the appropriate statutory form, copies of which are available from and should be returned to the Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department. Various requirements are placed on the body intending to make the application and reference should be made to the Act and supporting secondary legislation for further information.
The Keeper will not offer advice on the acceptability of such applications, nor will he supply application forms. However, pre-registration advice will be offered in respect of applications to the Land Register affected by pending or registered interests disclosed by the RCIL.
Before he may make a pending or registered entry in the RCIL, the Keeper must be directed to do so by the Scottish Ministers. It is not for the Keeper to determine the accuracy of the information submitted to the Ministers, for example the ownership of the land in question. It will, therefore, be inappropriate to rely solely on the RCIL in relation to the ownership of the property.
It should also be noted that Forms 10, 11, 12, 13 and P16 will not include a search of the RCIL, or disclose any information from the Register.
The existence of a registered community interest, or a pending application to the Scottish Ministers, will affect the landowner’s ability to market or take any action with a view to selling the affected land. The provisions also affect heritable creditors who have a right to sell the land.
Transfers, a term undefined in the Act, may be prohibited in terms of section 37(8) where Ministers are considering an application, or in terms of section 40 once the entry becomes registered. Certain transfers of land are excepted by section 40. In cases of transfers not so excepted, the effect is to make the transfer of no effect. In cases of breach, the pre-emptive right to buy becomes absolute.
The Keeper will, therefore, reject or cancel an application to the Land Register where it appears to him that it is affected by the existence of a pending or registered interest of a community body in RCIL. He may also choose to make a requisition for further evidence where the information in an application is insufficient for him to make a decision on whether it should be accepted, rejected or cancelled.
It should also be noted that section 4 of the Land Registration (Scotland) Act 1979 has been amended by the Act. The Keeper is now obliged to notify the Scottish Ministers whenever he rejects an application to the Land Register on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence to confirm that it was not a prohibited transfer in terms of section 40(1) or section 37(5)(e). The Keeper must also forward a copy of the application and notify them of the reason for rejection.
Section 40(4) sets out the types of transfers that are excluded from the prohibitions. These include those otherwise than for value, transfers of croft land to the croft tenant, transfers vesting the land in a trustee in sequestration or transfers in consequence of the assumption, death or resignation of a partner or trustee.
In the case of an exempt transfer, by section 43 it is a requirement that the transferor incorporates in the deed a declaration specifying which provision in section 40(4) applies. Additionally, a declaration is required that the transfer does not form part of a scheme, arrangement or series, the purpose or effect of which is to avoid the provisions of the Act. In the case of a transfer being registrable in the Land Register, the inclusion of such a declaration does not preclude the Keeper seeking further evidence in support of the application. The existence of either a pending or registered interest in RCIL should be declared in Land Register application forms. Where a deed recorded in the Register of Sasines contains such a declaration, and/or was impacted by entry in the Register, the Keeper may seek further evidence in respect of that transfer, should it form the progress of titles for an application for first registration in the Land Register.
The Register is free to view and search on the Internet via the Agency’s website www.ros.gov.uk/rcil, and on Registers Direct. The Register can be searched in a number of ways, for example Landowner, Community Body Name and Subjects Description. Full details and guidance on how to search the Register can be found on the RCIL web page. Copy documents pertaining to each registration can be viewed online, including the application form and any associated map. Key details of each registration can be viewed on the summary page.
Customers can also access the Register free of charge via the Agency’s Customer Service Centres at Erskine House, 68 Queen Street, Edinburgh EH2 4NF, and 9 George Square, Glasgow G2 1DY. Further Information on Community Right to Buy is available from:
Scottish Executive, Environment and Rural Affairs Department, Land Reform Branch, Pentland House, 47 Robb’s Loan, Edinburgh EH14 1TY (tel 0131 244 6003; email: CRTB@scotland.gov.uk; www.scotland.gov.uk).
Current Issue FeaturesBraving the stormHow different types of legal firm are coping with the current economic downturn, and how they see their future Civil justice: where next?An abridged version of the keynote address delivered to the conference on civil justice held in Edinburgh on 20 June Title Conditions Act: new registration proceduresNew procedures are in place for deeds intended to create new real burdens, to assist solicitors in complying with the requirement for dual registration Young lawyers rebornInterview with Scottish Young Lawyers Association President Maryam Labaki on SYLA's ambitions as it relaunches Shining some more light...Second part of overview of this year's Finance Act looks at the provisions on savings, pensions, residence/domicile and business taxes, among others Power to the tribunal?An advocate's and a solicitor's views of how the Scottish Government's proposed reforms to arbitration law might work in practice Piece by pieceA progress report from England & Wales on the setting up of the complex regulatory machinery under the Legal Services Act 2007 The poor in our midstInterview with Scottish Solicitors' Benevolent Fund convener Craig Bennet, who aims to raise awareness of the Fund so it can provide more help to those in need Current Issue ArticlesShifting sandsPresident's message: with economic issues dominating the profession's thoughts, the Society is taking steps to provide advice and support to those in need A rank bad ruleOpinion by two advocates that the Faculty's response to the OFT does its members a disservice by defending the cab rank rule and by resisting the use of ABS The Society's future role in complaints handlingA reminder, in the light of reactions to the first levy issued on behalf of the new Complaints Commission, of when and how the Society's responsibilities are changing Appreciation: Lord JohnstonReport of the tribute paid in court by the Lord President Professional Practice CommitteeNew guidelines on acting as a company director; and document control and file tracking Facing the lean yearsSome advice on how to pull through a recession and be ready for the next upturn, as word goes round of legal firms looking at staff cuts and other measures (part 1 of 2) It's a web 2.0 worldThe interactive nature of web 2.0 technology presents business opportunities, while posing new risks for those with inadequate precautions as to employee internet use Questions, questionsIn reviewing their risk profiles and risk controls, all firms might benefit from conducting a self-assessment by addressing questions put by some insurers elsewhere Bare necessitiesLatest criminal cases, including offensive weapons; Moorov rule; withdrawal of representation; evidence of a deceased; contempt of court by solicitor Coming on the blind sideA technical-sounding consultation, currently open for comments, covers some significant aspects of dispute resolution in employment Relocation, relocationA recent decision explores the matters to consider when one parent wants to relocate abroad along with their child Worse than the disease?Has the UK quietly outlawed "alternative" medicine through the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations? Sleeping bountyThe Scottish Community Foundation has a scheme to breathe new life into dormant charitable trusts Scottish Solicitors' Discipline TribunalReports relating to Eileen Agnes Coogans; Zosia Marion Elizabeth Fraser; Annaline Webster; Ian Samuel Gerard Donnelly; Mark David Sheppard Website reviewsReviews of sites of organisations concerned with domain name disputes Book reviewsReview of Child and Family Law (Sutherland) Industry standardA survey south of the border suggests that in-house work in commerce and industry doesn't always match expectations - but most in-house lawyers expect to stay Meet the committeeProfile of In-house Lawyers Group committee member Sara Scott What's in a motto?A sample of In-house Lawyers Group members' notarial mottoes, collected by ILG secretary Tricia Sim Leasing by example"Green leases" appear to be some way off yet for the UK, but a Canadian model now published shows how they might work Good call?Reply to article questioning the Donald Trump planning application call-in argues that the decision is both competent and consistent with proper operation of the system Home reports - the practice questionsOpen letter over reservations as to the Society's proposed guidelines on the operation of home reports, in so far as they deal with conflict of interest |