The Journal, May 2004, page 35
I have known lawyers who insisted that, if they ever left the office, it would be feet first. “They died with their wigs on” hasn’t got quite the ring of a John Wayne film, but you get the message. Perhaps they were enjoying the game so much, they couldn’t stop playing. Or, perhaps they were making so much money, they couldn’t bear to stop.
Nowadays, it is more likely that we can’t afford to stop.
Your profits may have recovered in recent years; but many firms took a battering in the 1990s. And the recent catastrophic fall in the stock market has made many lawyers look again at their pension funds and plans for early retirement.
The “baby boomers”, who were planning to retire from 2005 onwards, are putting back their plans until their pension funds have been restored. They want to live to 95, playing golf and visiting the Algarve regularly, with a bit in reserve for the nursing home.
But perhaps you are expecting to get a big boost from your partners in return for your early departure. Aren’t you entitled to a reward for the years devoted to the cause, working long days and late nights, attending Rotary Club bashes and kirk session meetings, extending the client base of the firm?
Not unless it’s printed in the partnership agreement, you’re not. Your partners are no more bound to make a generous farewell payment to you than they are to join the Law Society Council or fly to the moon. And they are not much likelier to either, if it isn’t down in black and blue.
Of course, you are entitled to withdraw the sums in your capital account, subject to the rules in the partnership agreement.
But, simply because you feel you are entitled to an additional farewell payment, it does not follow that your partners will feel the same way.
So, if you are thinking about retiring, have a look at the partnership agreement, and, if you haven’t got one, start preparing one. Be honest about your plans and you are more likely to get the right response from your partners. Trifle with the truth, and you may get what you deserve.
It is better for everyone if your retirement can proceed in a well-planned, orderly manner. Your partners may be afraid that you plan never to retire, but to hang around the corridors like an unpleasant odour, doing less and less work in return for a constant share of the profits.
They may be so pleased to hear that you do actually plan to retire that they will agree to give you an additional capital payment in return for your commitment to a particular date (and your share of the goodwill of the firm).
However, any such “goodwill” payment is unlikely to be large enough to finance your bad habits for the indefinite future. Meanwhile, you are going to have to keep dumping money into your pension plan. And here is some good news. If you are aged between 56 and 60, you are entitled to pay up to 35% of your earned income into your pension fund and claim tax relief on the whole amount.
Your partners may be prepared to employ you as a consultant for a while, and they may even be prepared to pay you a salary in return for whatever services you can provide. But, if you want to make a clean break, and avoid being the Ghost of Partners’ Meetings Past, you will want to look elsewhere for your extra income.
Writing is a natural outlet – it’s what lawyers do, after all. Property ownership is another favourite.
Radio is a natural outlet for those who can speak clearly and interestingly, although television requires a degree of pulchritude as well. Teaching/lecturing may work for those with something to teach.
But perhaps you’ve just had enough and want to spend more time with your family (now that most of them have left the house), your money or your dog. Perhaps you just can’t stand the early mornings, the late nights and the awkward clients any more.
If so, then go for it. Don’t wait around until you become a curmudgeon, miserable with your work and miserable to your clients, your staff and your partners. There are too many lawyers as it is, so pack it in and get on with whatever it is you really want to do, whether that is painting, travelling, writing your memoirs or just digging the garden. Don’t leave it so late that you haven’t got the energy or health to do what you want to.
Sometimes it’s not a question of whether you can afford to retire, it’s a question of whether you can afford not to.
Brian D Allingham founded Allingham & Co in 1982 and, retired as a partner recently, aged 51. He is a regular lecturer on management subjects, author of two books and a management consultant to many law firms. e: brian.allingham@virgin.net
Current Issue FeaturesBraving the stormHow different types of legal firm are coping with the current economic downturn, and how they see their future Civil justice: where next?An abridged version of the keynote address delivered to the conference on civil justice held in Edinburgh on 20 June Title Conditions Act: new registration proceduresNew procedures are in place for deeds intended to create new real burdens, to assist solicitors in complying with the requirement for dual registration Young lawyers rebornInterview with Scottish Young Lawyers Association President Maryam Labaki on SYLA's ambitions as it relaunches Shining some more light...Second part of overview of this year's Finance Act looks at the provisions on savings, pensions, residence/domicile and business taxes, among others Power to the tribunal?An advocate's and a solicitor's views of how the Scottish Government's proposed reforms to arbitration law might work in practice Piece by pieceA progress report from England & Wales on the setting up of the complex regulatory machinery under the Legal Services Act 2007 The poor in our midstInterview with Scottish Solicitors' Benevolent Fund convener Craig Bennet, who aims to raise awareness of the Fund so it can provide more help to those in need Current Issue ArticlesShifting sandsPresident's message: with economic issues dominating the profession's thoughts, the Society is taking steps to provide advice and support to those in need A rank bad ruleOpinion by two advocates that the Faculty's response to the OFT does its members a disservice by defending the cab rank rule and by resisting the use of ABS The Society's future role in complaints handlingA reminder, in the light of reactions to the first levy issued on behalf of the new Complaints Commission, of when and how the Society's responsibilities are changing Appreciation: Lord JohnstonReport of the tribute paid in court by the Lord President Professional Practice CommitteeNew guidelines on acting as a company director; and document control and file tracking Facing the lean yearsSome advice on how to pull through a recession and be ready for the next upturn, as word goes round of legal firms looking at staff cuts and other measures (part 1 of 2) It's a web 2.0 worldThe interactive nature of web 2.0 technology presents business opportunities, while posing new risks for those with inadequate precautions as to employee internet use Questions, questionsIn reviewing their risk profiles and risk controls, all firms might benefit from conducting a self-assessment by addressing questions put by some insurers elsewhere Bare necessitiesLatest criminal cases, including offensive weapons; Moorov rule; withdrawal of representation; evidence of a deceased; contempt of court by solicitor Coming on the blind sideA technical-sounding consultation, currently open for comments, covers some significant aspects of dispute resolution in employment Relocation, relocationA recent decision explores the matters to consider when one parent wants to relocate abroad along with their child Worse than the disease?Has the UK quietly outlawed "alternative" medicine through the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations? Sleeping bountyThe Scottish Community Foundation has a scheme to breathe new life into dormant charitable trusts Scottish Solicitors' Discipline TribunalReports relating to Eileen Agnes Coogans; Zosia Marion Elizabeth Fraser; Annaline Webster; Ian Samuel Gerard Donnelly; Mark David Sheppard Website reviewsReviews of sites of organisations concerned with domain name disputes Book reviewsReview of Child and Family Law (Sutherland) Industry standardA survey south of the border suggests that in-house work in commerce and industry doesn't always match expectations - but most in-house lawyers expect to stay Meet the committeeProfile of In-house Lawyers Group committee member Sara Scott What's in a motto?A sample of In-house Lawyers Group members' notarial mottoes, collected by ILG secretary Tricia Sim Leasing by example"Green leases" appear to be some way off yet for the UK, but a Canadian model now published shows how they might work Good call?Reply to article questioning the Donald Trump planning application call-in argues that the decision is both competent and consistent with proper operation of the system Home reports - the practice questionsOpen letter over reservations as to the Society's proposed guidelines on the operation of home reports, in so far as they deal with conflict of interest |