The Journal, April 2004, page 32
The EC Directive 2002/96/EC on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) came into force on 13 February 2003, with implementation by the member states due by 13 August 2004, and although it will affect everyone at work and at home, you may not have heard much about it.
A survey last summer reported that 81% of UK companies had not heard of WEEE and only 4% were familiar with it. Unless you raise your awareness of WEEE you, your firm and your clients could all be caught out, facing, in some circumstances, penalties up to a £5,000 fine or two years’ imprisonment for non-compliance.
This article is intended to provide an overview of the WEEE Directive to increase awareness and encourage compliance with draft regulations and guidance due in May 2004 and the legislation on 13 August 2004.
Waste is a growing problem affecting us all. Everyone will have heard reports of local authority landfill sites rapidly filling up. Many will now have a number of recycling wheelie bins and boxes at home as councils get to grips with Government recycling targets. We all generate waste, we are all responsible.
WEEE covers a huge range of electrical and electronic products – computers, monitors, fax machines, printers, washing machines, tumble dryers, bedside radios, Playstations, TVs, telephones, video players – which have historically been sent to landfill at the end of their life. The EU estimates that WEEE currently amounts to 6.5 million tonnes per year and by 2015 could be 12 million tonnes per year – the equivalent of family saloons parked bumper to bumper on 10,000 football pitches! Yet WEEE is unsuitable for landfill as it can contain heavy metals, organic pollutants and other toxic substances that pollute soil and groundwater. It is also very bulky, accelerating the rate at which finite landfill is used up. WEEE might also contain items or materials of value, which could be recycled or reused.
The Directive aims to reduce the amount of WEEE and its hazardous nature and encourage efficiency. Among the main points of WEEE noted by the Department of Trade and Industry are:
As we all have WEEE we are all affected in one way or another, and your clients may seek advice, so it is important that you have some awareness of the Directive and its implications. Reports in the IT press suggest that the DTI is considering a maximum penalty of two years’ imprisonment and a significant fine for organisations failing to comply with the legislation. The DTI have indicated that the penalties may be in line with the European Communities Act but precise details will not become apparent until the draft regulations and guidance are published in May 2004.
While WEEE covers a broad range of equipment it is likely that the main concerns within a firm will be with IT equipment. IT and telecommunications equipment make up a significant percentage of WEEE.
From 13 August 2005, one year after the WEEE implementation date, manufacturers and importers of IT hardware must arrange and fund the recovery, reuse and recycling of it when replacements are bought on a one-for-one, like-for-like basis. Where there is no like-for-like basis the firm will be responsible for disposing of the equipment if it was manufactured before 13 August 2005. Where equipment is simply to be disposed of and not replaced, firms will be responsible. The following recommendations should be noted:
Costs of equipment will likely rise. When drawing up budgets from now, ensure disposal costs are factored in.
It is recommended that from now on when selecting suppliers and purchasing equipment the disposal credentials of the supplier must be identified. Do they have an IT disposal policy which is WEEE compliant?
Consider equipment specifications carefully when purchasing from now on. Where possible think ahead and consider the replacement of that equipment such that it can be replaced on a like-for-like, one-for-one basis. Focus wherever possible on standard specifications. Where this is not possible account for the extra costs in disposal of that kit you may have to bear when it becomes obsolete.
Yes! Two further directives are important and relate to WEEE. These are:
The timetable for these directives is 1 July 2006. From that date lead, mercury, cadmium, chromium and other toxins found in the components, chips and circuit boards making up IT kit must be phased out. This has implications for the manufacture of IT equipment as new materials will need to be found. Research has been undertaken for the development of lead free solder.
The WEEE Directive becomes law on 13 August 2004 and will affect everyone whether at home or at work. It is important to:
Current Issue FeaturesBraving the stormHow different types of legal firm are coping with the current economic downturn, and how they see their future Civil justice: where next?An abridged version of the keynote address delivered to the conference on civil justice held in Edinburgh on 20 June Title Conditions Act: new registration proceduresNew procedures are in place for deeds intended to create new real burdens, to assist solicitors in complying with the requirement for dual registration Young lawyers rebornInterview with Scottish Young Lawyers Association President Maryam Labaki on SYLA's ambitions as it relaunches Shining some more light...Second part of overview of this year's Finance Act looks at the provisions on savings, pensions, residence/domicile and business taxes, among others Power to the tribunal?An advocate's and a solicitor's views of how the Scottish Government's proposed reforms to arbitration law might work in practice Piece by pieceA progress report from England & Wales on the setting up of the complex regulatory machinery under the Legal Services Act 2007 The poor in our midstInterview with Scottish Solicitors' Benevolent Fund convener Craig Bennet, who aims to raise awareness of the Fund so it can provide more help to those in need Current Issue ArticlesShifting sandsPresident's message: with economic issues dominating the profession's thoughts, the Society is taking steps to provide advice and support to those in need A rank bad ruleOpinion by two advocates that the Faculty's response to the OFT does its members a disservice by defending the cab rank rule and by resisting the use of ABS The Society's future role in complaints handlingA reminder, in the light of reactions to the first levy issued on behalf of the new Complaints Commission, of when and how the Society's responsibilities are changing Appreciation: Lord JohnstonReport of the tribute paid in court by the Lord President Professional Practice CommitteeNew guidelines on acting as a company director; and document control and file tracking Facing the lean yearsSome advice on how to pull through a recession and be ready for the next upturn, as word goes round of legal firms looking at staff cuts and other measures (part 1 of 2) It's a web 2.0 worldThe interactive nature of web 2.0 technology presents business opportunities, while posing new risks for those with inadequate precautions as to employee internet use Questions, questionsIn reviewing their risk profiles and risk controls, all firms might benefit from conducting a self-assessment by addressing questions put by some insurers elsewhere Bare necessitiesLatest criminal cases, including offensive weapons; Moorov rule; withdrawal of representation; evidence of a deceased; contempt of court by solicitor Coming on the blind sideA technical-sounding consultation, currently open for comments, covers some significant aspects of dispute resolution in employment Relocation, relocationA recent decision explores the matters to consider when one parent wants to relocate abroad along with their child Worse than the disease?Has the UK quietly outlawed "alternative" medicine through the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations? Sleeping bountyThe Scottish Community Foundation has a scheme to breathe new life into dormant charitable trusts Scottish Solicitors' Discipline TribunalReports relating to Eileen Agnes Coogans; Zosia Marion Elizabeth Fraser; Annaline Webster; Ian Samuel Gerard Donnelly; Mark David Sheppard Website reviewsReviews of sites of organisations concerned with domain name disputes Book reviewsReview of Child and Family Law (Sutherland) Industry standardA survey south of the border suggests that in-house work in commerce and industry doesn't always match expectations - but most in-house lawyers expect to stay Meet the committeeProfile of In-house Lawyers Group committee member Sara Scott What's in a motto?A sample of In-house Lawyers Group members' notarial mottoes, collected by ILG secretary Tricia Sim Leasing by example"Green leases" appear to be some way off yet for the UK, but a Canadian model now published shows how they might work Good call?Reply to article questioning the Donald Trump planning application call-in argues that the decision is both competent and consistent with proper operation of the system Home reports - the practice questionsOpen letter over reservations as to the Society's proposed guidelines on the operation of home reports, in so far as they deal with conflict of interest |