The Journal, January 2004, page 21
Contrary to popular belief, many family businesses in Scotland are getting their act together, professionalising the management of both the business and the family to create greater all-round stability, unity and direction.
In Scotland we have learnt a lot from our European counterparts and from our colleagues in the private sector closer to home, and I believe we are shrugging off the age-old tendency not to talk amongst trusted company about the more emotive owner-related issues. This move towards greater openness and trust should prompt a more enlightened perspective from our professional advisers who either wittingly or unwittingly can exacerbate the tensions, doing more harm than good.
Setting up a family council is, I believe, an invaluable first step, especially for businesses where the ownership has moved on from brothers/sisters to cousins and the heady cocktail of business and owner needs becomes more complex and difficult to deal with when the proverbial hits the fan.
To put you in the picture, the William Grant & Sons Family Council is a firmly integrated addition to our governance structure, sitting alongside the main board, comprising a representative body of our shareholders. We meet four times a year for a full day to discuss a strategic, non-operational agenda which is carefully prepared and minuted, and forward our recommendations to the board via the company chairman.
In setting it up we chose to work with our company secretary, whose input was invaluable in steering us towards the most effective constitution, matching our objectives and values with the need for a formal structure.
We were advised that we should avoid an excessively rigid constitution, as this would undermine the spirit of openness and respect that is essential to our success as a forum. The representation around the table matches the shareholding by family branch, with nine members and myself as chairman. We make recommendations for action, not hard and fast decisions, to encourage a collaborative relationship with the management board. These are based on a collective consensus, with one person one vote around the table as opposed to voting by shareholding. This gives the council sufficient structure to operate while upholding our core values, reaching agreement in the interest of the group, not individuals.
I would urge advisers to recommend a similar approach, balancing the need for structure with a more urgent need for openness and respect among the group. Our experience shows that as the family council matures, the constitution should evolve to incorporate more structure in certain aspects such as the election process for the chairman, rotation of members and election to working groups such as our Next Generation Group.
My role as chairman was created in 1998 out of our commitment, after a fair deal of soul searching and no small number of heated debates, to managing our responsibilities as shareholders more professionally. This was against a background of commercial success and a mix of inevitable tensions which my father and uncle cheerfully remind us are nothing new, and are in fact quite healthy. I should add that I am something of a black sheep having never worked in the business, choosing to plough my own furrow in the media and communications sector.
Actually not! While it has not been exactly plain sailing, I am delighted to have played a part in connecting us more closely as a family, and in developing a more progressive culture of enlightened ownership, and trust.
At each of our meetings, the result is a hugely beneficial open discussion, a greater sense of structured involvement without “interfering” and, while we may disagree on some issues, a greater sense of unity and purpose – all of which is good for the business which doesn’t have to second guess where the shareholders stand.
Trust is the key word here, because without it the meetings are meaningless. At best, we would have a table of cynical passengers, and at worst the dynamic deteriorates into childish self-preservation, manifesting itself in bonanza time for lawyers, accountants, heart surgeons, psychologists and so on.
It does not have to be and should not be this way.
One of the ironies of sharing problems and networking with other family businesses is the realisation after a few drams that perhaps we are not as bad as we thought – sad but true.
I know of two prominent family businesses who are currently well down the legal proceedings road after tensions have blown up, followed by the individuals involved scurrying off to their legal advisers. The cost to the business is not yet known but is likely to be substantial. The cost to the family relations is incalculable, and the benefits to the professionals will in my view be a short term gain vastly exceeded by the long term loss of trust, respect and business in the wider family business community. Being open, we at Wm Grants are no angels, but we have not resorted and should never resort to court battles to sort out our differences.
Why do professional advisers not act more responsibly in these cases, urging the family to meet and discuss the issues as a group instead of taking the more partisan route? I don’t know the answer, but please bear this in mind – differences of opinion in family businesses can and do become personalised. Grown men and women revert to teenage behaviour.
There is an important role for professional advisers to family business owners – we have recently engaged an adviser to our family council to address a number of current issues. Their remit is 100% to the group, not the individuals. This I believe is healthy and should be the way forward, with more professionals resisting the poisoned chalice of personal bust-ups and embracing a broader, more enlightened approach in line with our more progressive outlook.
For more information check out www.familycouncilworks.co.uk
Current Issue FeaturesBraving the stormHow different types of legal firm are coping with the current economic downturn, and how they see their future Civil justice: where next?An abridged version of the keynote address delivered to the conference on civil justice held in Edinburgh on 20 June Title Conditions Act: new registration proceduresNew procedures are in place for deeds intended to create new real burdens, to assist solicitors in complying with the requirement for dual registration Young lawyers rebornInterview with Scottish Young Lawyers Association President Maryam Labaki on SYLA's ambitions as it relaunches Shining some more light...Second part of overview of this year's Finance Act looks at the provisions on savings, pensions, residence/domicile and business taxes, among others Power to the tribunal?An advocate's and a solicitor's views of how the Scottish Government's proposed reforms to arbitration law might work in practice Piece by pieceA progress report from England & Wales on the setting up of the complex regulatory machinery under the Legal Services Act 2007 The poor in our midstInterview with Scottish Solicitors' Benevolent Fund convener Craig Bennet, who aims to raise awareness of the Fund so it can provide more help to those in need Current Issue ArticlesShifting sandsPresident's message: with economic issues dominating the profession's thoughts, the Society is taking steps to provide advice and support to those in need A rank bad ruleOpinion by two advocates that the Faculty's response to the OFT does its members a disservice by defending the cab rank rule and by resisting the use of ABS The Society's future role in complaints handlingA reminder, in the light of reactions to the first levy issued on behalf of the new Complaints Commission, of when and how the Society's responsibilities are changing Appreciation: Lord JohnstonReport of the tribute paid in court by the Lord President Professional Practice CommitteeNew guidelines on acting as a company director; and document control and file tracking Facing the lean yearsSome advice on how to pull through a recession and be ready for the next upturn, as word goes round of legal firms looking at staff cuts and other measures (part 1 of 2) It's a web 2.0 worldThe interactive nature of web 2.0 technology presents business opportunities, while posing new risks for those with inadequate precautions as to employee internet use Questions, questionsIn reviewing their risk profiles and risk controls, all firms might benefit from conducting a self-assessment by addressing questions put by some insurers elsewhere Bare necessitiesLatest criminal cases, including offensive weapons; Moorov rule; withdrawal of representation; evidence of a deceased; contempt of court by solicitor Coming on the blind sideA technical-sounding consultation, currently open for comments, covers some significant aspects of dispute resolution in employment Relocation, relocationA recent decision explores the matters to consider when one parent wants to relocate abroad along with their child Worse than the disease?Has the UK quietly outlawed "alternative" medicine through the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations? Sleeping bountyThe Scottish Community Foundation has a scheme to breathe new life into dormant charitable trusts Scottish Solicitors' Discipline TribunalReports relating to Eileen Agnes Coogans; Zosia Marion Elizabeth Fraser; Annaline Webster; Ian Samuel Gerard Donnelly; Mark David Sheppard Website reviewsReviews of sites of organisations concerned with domain name disputes Book reviewsReview of Child and Family Law (Sutherland) Industry standardA survey south of the border suggests that in-house work in commerce and industry doesn't always match expectations - but most in-house lawyers expect to stay Meet the committeeProfile of In-house Lawyers Group committee member Sara Scott What's in a motto?A sample of In-house Lawyers Group members' notarial mottoes, collected by ILG secretary Tricia Sim Leasing by example"Green leases" appear to be some way off yet for the UK, but a Canadian model now published shows how they might work Good call?Reply to article questioning the Donald Trump planning application call-in argues that the decision is both competent and consistent with proper operation of the system Home reports - the practice questionsOpen letter over reservations as to the Society's proposed guidelines on the operation of home reports, in so far as they deal with conflict of interest |