The Journal, October 2004, page 49
AUTHOR: ROBIN EVANS-JONES
PUBLISHER: W GREEN/SULI
ISBN: 0 414 00997 5
PRICE: £150
The Scots law of unjustified enrichment has been the subject of immense judicial and academic innovation and re-ordering over the past 20 years. Neither Roman law, from which many of its concepts are drawn, nor the institutional writers recognised a category of obligations so classified. Scots law long appeared as a loose group of actions classified as restitution, repetition and recompense (the 3 Rs) on top of a confusing underlay of the Roman-derived condictiones. The recognition of a common underlying principle only came in 1995 with the Morgan Guaranty case.
Professor Robin Evans-Jones has been a leading contributor to this development. Now he has drawn together and expanded his previous work into a major study of the central direct-conferral enrichment claims, principally focused on the condictiones. The result is a truly outstanding and ground-breaking book which will be the primary reference point in the field for many years to come. It is a model of exceptionally clear and rigorous analysis, utilising civilian, historical, theoretical and comparative insights and sources to set out, re-conceptualise and critically evaluate the subject with reference to a large body of Scots case law. It does not shirk from addressing debates of great complexity, but also presents clear conclusions about the nature of the various claims described. In places the discussion may appear somewhat theoretical and involved, but this is an inevitable feature of a work which is conceptualising the subject for the first time in Scots law in such depth (convincingly, at least), and providing a framework within which to situate as well as describe the various grounds of action and remedies.
This, the first of two volumes, deals with the structure and history of the general concepts, the main series of claims which can be made in terms of the various condictiones received by Scots law from Roman law, and also general chapters on the technical meaning of enrichment, the requirements for establishing enrichment as being at another’s expense, remedies, the measure of recovery, and defences. The second volume will consider enrichment other than by direct conferral, for example through interference with another’s property rights.
The chapter on history and general concepts is a taxing but essential one, since it explains the classification of the subject, particularly the historical differences between restitution and recompense, but also how these are now to be understood simply as remedies available in relation to the particular grounds of action provided by each condictio. A persuasive argument is advanced for regarding all the causes of action represented by the condictiones as unified by the idea of failure of purpose in making a transfer, for example to discharge an obligation which flows from a contract which is void. Practical implications arise : the condictio indebiti, for example, is as much a cause of action for the remedy of recompense as for restitution, and so a claim for restitution should always be pled in the alternative as recompense, in case the property can no longer be restored.Recovery of transfers made for an illegal or immoral purpose and the residual condictio sine causa are also explained and examined. Very useful, highly technical treatments are given of specific topics such as transactions involving three parties, the role of equity in enrichment law, and the defences of change of position and gathering and consumption of fruits in good faith. The intimate relationship of enrichment with other areas of private law, especially property and obligations, is emphasised. New solutions are offered to problems such as the insistence in Morgan Guaranty that error is part of the cause of action of the condictio indebiti (treat some cases under the condictio sine causa), or the exclusion of enrichment remedies following breach of contract (contract law should develop a fuller concept of mutuality which supports such recovery).
Overall, though excessively expensive for a first volume of 341 pages, this fascinating and original book is to be warmly welcomed as a fine scholarly achievement which will assist practitioners whilst doing a great deal to further academic debate and judicial deliberation.
Dr Mark Godfrey, Lecturer in Scots Law, University of Glasgow
Current Issue FeaturesBraving the stormHow different types of legal firm are coping with the current economic downturn, and how they see their future Civil justice: where next?An abridged version of the keynote address delivered to the conference on civil justice held in Edinburgh on 20 June Title Conditions Act: new registration proceduresNew procedures are in place for deeds intended to create new real burdens, to assist solicitors in complying with the requirement for dual registration Young lawyers rebornInterview with Scottish Young Lawyers Association President Maryam Labaki on SYLA's ambitions as it relaunches Shining some more light...Second part of overview of this year's Finance Act looks at the provisions on savings, pensions, residence/domicile and business taxes, among others Power to the tribunal?An advocate's and a solicitor's views of how the Scottish Government's proposed reforms to arbitration law might work in practice Piece by pieceA progress report from England & Wales on the setting up of the complex regulatory machinery under the Legal Services Act 2007 The poor in our midstInterview with Scottish Solicitors' Benevolent Fund convener Craig Bennet, who aims to raise awareness of the Fund so it can provide more help to those in need Current Issue ArticlesShifting sandsPresident's message: with economic issues dominating the profession's thoughts, the Society is taking steps to provide advice and support to those in need A rank bad ruleOpinion by two advocates that the Faculty's response to the OFT does its members a disservice by defending the cab rank rule and by resisting the use of ABS The Society's future role in complaints handlingA reminder, in the light of reactions to the first levy issued on behalf of the new Complaints Commission, of when and how the Society's responsibilities are changing Appreciation: Lord JohnstonReport of the tribute paid in court by the Lord President Professional Practice CommitteeNew guidelines on acting as a company director; and document control and file tracking Facing the lean yearsSome advice on how to pull through a recession and be ready for the next upturn, as word goes round of legal firms looking at staff cuts and other measures (part 1 of 2) It's a web 2.0 worldThe interactive nature of web 2.0 technology presents business opportunities, while posing new risks for those with inadequate precautions as to employee internet use Questions, questionsIn reviewing their risk profiles and risk controls, all firms might benefit from conducting a self-assessment by addressing questions put by some insurers elsewhere Bare necessitiesLatest criminal cases, including offensive weapons; Moorov rule; withdrawal of representation; evidence of a deceased; contempt of court by solicitor Coming on the blind sideA technical-sounding consultation, currently open for comments, covers some significant aspects of dispute resolution in employment Relocation, relocationA recent decision explores the matters to consider when one parent wants to relocate abroad along with their child Worse than the disease?Has the UK quietly outlawed "alternative" medicine through the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations? Sleeping bountyThe Scottish Community Foundation has a scheme to breathe new life into dormant charitable trusts Scottish Solicitors' Discipline TribunalReports relating to Eileen Agnes Coogans; Zosia Marion Elizabeth Fraser; Annaline Webster; Ian Samuel Gerard Donnelly; Mark David Sheppard Website reviewsReviews of sites of organisations concerned with domain name disputes Book reviewsReview of Child and Family Law (Sutherland) Industry standardA survey south of the border suggests that in-house work in commerce and industry doesn't always match expectations - but most in-house lawyers expect to stay Meet the committeeProfile of In-house Lawyers Group committee member Sara Scott What's in a motto?A sample of In-house Lawyers Group members' notarial mottoes, collected by ILG secretary Tricia Sim Leasing by example"Green leases" appear to be some way off yet for the UK, but a Canadian model now published shows how they might work Good call?Reply to article questioning the Donald Trump planning application call-in argues that the decision is both competent and consistent with proper operation of the system Home reports - the practice questionsOpen letter over reservations as to the Society's proposed guidelines on the operation of home reports, in so far as they deal with conflict of interest |