The Journal, December 2004, page 22
This has had a significant impact for family law practice as children have begun to instruct their own agents. The representation of children is a particularly challenging and sensitive area of practice, and should not be undertaken without an awareness of its particular demands. In many jurisdictions guidance is available to children’s advocates, and it was felt that the Law Society of Scotland should give guidance for Scottish lawyers. The result was the Child Protection and Representation Principles for Children’s Lawyers, launched by Cathy Jamieson on 4 November this year.
This document is intended as a first stage in the provision of guidance. It is limited to private law, and is intended to change and grow as law and practice evolve. It has been approved by the Council of the Law Society of Scotland, and is intended to operate as a statement of best practice. It is not an official practice rule, but regard may be had to it should any question arise concerning a solicitor’s professional conduct or service. It is anticipated that work will begin on public law in the near future.
Children and young people are owed the same duties as adult clients, but acting for them has challenges that acting for an adult does not. It is simply not good enough to cut down normal practice to size to fit the child. A solicitor representing a child must tailor his or her approach to communication to the age and understanding of that particular child.
The areas of particular attention in the Principles are: accepting and obtaining instructions; communication; duties of representation; confidentiality and client legal privilege; conflict of interest; and withdrawing from acting.
Accepting and obtaining instructions from an adult is usually straightforward unless there is a question of mental illness or impairment. It is a much more complex question when the client is a child, particularly a young child. The agent must consider not only whether or not the child is able to understand matters sufficiently to be able to give instructions, but also whether the child actually does wish to be drawn into the legal process or is there at the wish of one of the adults in his or her life. These are not simple matters. They require care and a certain degree of perception. A further complication is that once having taken on a child as client, one must be aware that one will have to assess throughout the conduct of the case whether the child can continue to give instructions, or indeed still wishes to.
The best interests of the child are the paramount consideration in the areas of law dealing with children, and must be the paramount consideration for a lawyer representing a child. This can be challenging if the instructions given by the child are seen by the agent as not being in their best interests. This must be balanced with the solicitor’s duty to advocate the instructions of the client. A conflict may well lead to the refusing of instruction, or withdrawal from acting.
Withdrawing from acting for a child can be a much more delicate and sensitive process. Children tend to bestow their trust on a much more personal level than most adults, and sometimes the lawyer is one of the few trusted adults in a child’s life. Withdrawing from acting must be handled with the same level of care as accepting of instructions.
Good written and verbal communication is utterly essential to the successful representation of a child. Basic rules for communication are provided by the Principles. Communication with a child client must be specifically tailored to the needs of that client, and be appropriate to their age, understanding and circumstances. Children are much more likely to be dependent than adults on face to face communication, and great care must be taken at each stage of the case to ensure that the child does understand what is going on. It can be much more difficult for the agent, whose client may be much happier with frequent short meetings, and no telephone calls or letters. The child client’s needs are, however, not as open to adjustment as those of a demanding adult client, and it is the lawyer who must be willing to accept the needs of the child and to adapt their practice to them. An invaluable further resource is Alison Cleland and Ann Hall Dick’s Child Centred Family Law Practice.
Client confidentiality is the same for a child as for an adult, but can be complex when the child lives with an adult who gets to the post first in the morning. Care must be taken to consult the child about letters to them, and the Principles address the difficulties that can arise.
It might seem that the conflict of interest rules in representing a child would be the same as representing an adult. However, there are traps for the unwary. Because children are more vulnerable to influence it is important to avoid representing a child with whom you have or have had a personal relationship, or if you have had a personal relationship with their parents or carers. It may seem easier for the child to consult a familiar person, but real questions of influence and conflict of interest can arise. It is important that agents realise that even if a child’s views coincide with those of a parent, if that parent is represented by the same firm a conflict of interest automatically arises. When in doubt, check the Principles and if still unsure, it would be wise to consult the Law Society of Scotland.
The direct representation of children is still comparatively new, and is rapidly evolving. As it does so the training of lawyers representing children will also have to change. The profession is challenged by a new field of practice and will have to respond effectively to ensure that Scotland’s children get appropriate and effective representation. The Society hopes that the Principles can be of assistance to the profession in the provision of legal services to children. Copies have been sent to firms known to practise in civil litigation. It is anticipated that the document will change and evolve, and the Child Representation Working Party would be pleased to receive any comments, suggestions or questions. If further copies are required, they can be obtained from Moira Goll at the Society’s Law Reform Department.
Morag Driscoll is Convener of the Law Society of Scotland’s Family Law Committee
Current Issue FeaturesBraving the stormHow different types of legal firm are coping with the current economic downturn, and how they see their future Civil justice: where next?An abridged version of the keynote address delivered to the conference on civil justice held in Edinburgh on 20 June Title Conditions Act: new registration proceduresNew procedures are in place for deeds intended to create new real burdens, to assist solicitors in complying with the requirement for dual registration Young lawyers rebornInterview with Scottish Young Lawyers Association President Maryam Labaki on SYLA's ambitions as it relaunches Shining some more light...Second part of overview of this year's Finance Act looks at the provisions on savings, pensions, residence/domicile and business taxes, among others Power to the tribunal?An advocate's and a solicitor's views of how the Scottish Government's proposed reforms to arbitration law might work in practice Piece by pieceA progress report from England & Wales on the setting up of the complex regulatory machinery under the Legal Services Act 2007 The poor in our midstInterview with Scottish Solicitors' Benevolent Fund convener Craig Bennet, who aims to raise awareness of the Fund so it can provide more help to those in need Current Issue ArticlesShifting sandsPresident's message: with economic issues dominating the profession's thoughts, the Society is taking steps to provide advice and support to those in need A rank bad ruleOpinion by two advocates that the Faculty's response to the OFT does its members a disservice by defending the cab rank rule and by resisting the use of ABS The Society's future role in complaints handlingA reminder, in the light of reactions to the first levy issued on behalf of the new Complaints Commission, of when and how the Society's responsibilities are changing Appreciation: Lord JohnstonReport of the tribute paid in court by the Lord President Professional Practice CommitteeNew guidelines on acting as a company director; and document control and file tracking Facing the lean yearsSome advice on how to pull through a recession and be ready for the next upturn, as word goes round of legal firms looking at staff cuts and other measures (part 1 of 2) It's a web 2.0 worldThe interactive nature of web 2.0 technology presents business opportunities, while posing new risks for those with inadequate precautions as to employee internet use Questions, questionsIn reviewing their risk profiles and risk controls, all firms might benefit from conducting a self-assessment by addressing questions put by some insurers elsewhere Bare necessitiesLatest criminal cases, including offensive weapons; Moorov rule; withdrawal of representation; evidence of a deceased; contempt of court by solicitor Coming on the blind sideA technical-sounding consultation, currently open for comments, covers some significant aspects of dispute resolution in employment Relocation, relocationA recent decision explores the matters to consider when one parent wants to relocate abroad along with their child Worse than the disease?Has the UK quietly outlawed "alternative" medicine through the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations? Sleeping bountyThe Scottish Community Foundation has a scheme to breathe new life into dormant charitable trusts Scottish Solicitors' Discipline TribunalReports relating to Eileen Agnes Coogans; Zosia Marion Elizabeth Fraser; Annaline Webster; Ian Samuel Gerard Donnelly; Mark David Sheppard Website reviewsReviews of sites of organisations concerned with domain name disputes Book reviewsReview of Child and Family Law (Sutherland) Industry standardA survey south of the border suggests that in-house work in commerce and industry doesn't always match expectations - but most in-house lawyers expect to stay Meet the committeeProfile of In-house Lawyers Group committee member Sara Scott What's in a motto?A sample of In-house Lawyers Group members' notarial mottoes, collected by ILG secretary Tricia Sim Leasing by example"Green leases" appear to be some way off yet for the UK, but a Canadian model now published shows how they might work Good call?Reply to article questioning the Donald Trump planning application call-in argues that the decision is both competent and consistent with proper operation of the system Home reports - the practice questionsOpen letter over reservations as to the Society's proposed guidelines on the operation of home reports, in so far as they deal with conflict of interest |