The Journal, February 2005, page 50
This is particularly relevant to Edinburgh where offers subject to survey are now the norm. Does this apply to closing date situations only, or to both closing date situations and situations where an offer has been made without a closing date, such as for a fixed price property? Surely (and particularly in the latter situation) it is not in the interest of the seller that a renegotiation of the price cannot be suggested without the purchaser having to resort to another solicitor. At the end of the day the seller can surely say “no” to such a suggested renegotiation on the price if they are not interested at a lower price, but not even being offered the option to renegotiate due to the guidelines would not be in the interest of the seller. Obviously some purchasers may resort to going to another solicitor to renegotiate the offer, but some will choose not to do so given their otherwise excellent relationship with their current solicitor or due to the inconvenience, or both. I can only see that it will create situations where the usual negotiating process has to be knocked on the head and existing clients of the firm have to be turned away to other solicitors for no good reason.
I can see some more relevance of this in a closing date situation, but in any event, if the seller is happy to renegotiate with the original offeror and decides to accept a lower offer, I can see no harm in this. At the end of the day, the seller could decide to revert to the second highest offeror if that were preferable.
A second point is that the sellers are not usually party to what the client’s survey says and I assume that there is no obligation on the solicitor acting for the purchaser to disclose any problem raised in the survey report. Who is to know if the problem relates to a low valuation or indeed to a rot problem? Would it be sufficient to say that the surveyor mentioned that there were a few slates missing from the roof before negotiating a £15,000 reduction in the purchase price?
Surely we should be trying to lay down guidelines that will be reasonable and will look after interests of the purchasers, the sellers and, to a certain extent, the solicitors. I would have thought that “gazundering” should only be a term that would be used in a situation where an offer had been accepted and any “subject to survey” clause had been removed by the purchasing solicitor without any qualifications regarding that survey. I can see that it is unfair to “gazunder” once that stage has been reached, but I really cannot agree with the suggestion that the price cannot be negotiated once a survey report has been received by the purchaser and before the “subject to survey” clause has been uplifted/deleted.
I think it is important that the guidelines are clarified by the Conveyancing Committee as to what we need to do in this particular circumstance.
I think it is patently unfair that we have to refuse to act for and also inconvenience perfectly good clients if, as sometimes happens, survey valuations do not meet the purchaser’s needs or expectations. I hope that this is not a suggestion to detract from the current practice in Edinburgh of offering “subject to survey” and to railroad us towards the seller’s survey.
Struan Douglas, Purdie & Co, Edinburgh
Current Issue FeaturesBraving the stormHow different types of legal firm are coping with the current economic downturn, and how they see their future Civil justice: where next?An abridged version of the keynote address delivered to the conference on civil justice held in Edinburgh on 20 June Title Conditions Act: new registration proceduresNew procedures are in place for deeds intended to create new real burdens, to assist solicitors in complying with the requirement for dual registration Young lawyers rebornInterview with Scottish Young Lawyers Association President Maryam Labaki on SYLA's ambitions as it relaunches Shining some more light...Second part of overview of this year's Finance Act looks at the provisions on savings, pensions, residence/domicile and business taxes, among others Power to the tribunal?An advocate's and a solicitor's views of how the Scottish Government's proposed reforms to arbitration law might work in practice Piece by pieceA progress report from England & Wales on the setting up of the complex regulatory machinery under the Legal Services Act 2007 The poor in our midstInterview with Scottish Solicitors' Benevolent Fund convener Craig Bennet, who aims to raise awareness of the Fund so it can provide more help to those in need Current Issue ArticlesShifting sandsPresident's message: with economic issues dominating the profession's thoughts, the Society is taking steps to provide advice and support to those in need A rank bad ruleOpinion by two advocates that the Faculty's response to the OFT does its members a disservice by defending the cab rank rule and by resisting the use of ABS The Society's future role in complaints handlingA reminder, in the light of reactions to the first levy issued on behalf of the new Complaints Commission, of when and how the Society's responsibilities are changing Appreciation: Lord JohnstonReport of the tribute paid in court by the Lord President Professional Practice CommitteeNew guidelines on acting as a company director; and document control and file tracking Facing the lean yearsSome advice on how to pull through a recession and be ready for the next upturn, as word goes round of legal firms looking at staff cuts and other measures (part 1 of 2) It's a web 2.0 worldThe interactive nature of web 2.0 technology presents business opportunities, while posing new risks for those with inadequate precautions as to employee internet use Questions, questionsIn reviewing their risk profiles and risk controls, all firms might benefit from conducting a self-assessment by addressing questions put by some insurers elsewhere Bare necessitiesLatest criminal cases, including offensive weapons; Moorov rule; withdrawal of representation; evidence of a deceased; contempt of court by solicitor Coming on the blind sideA technical-sounding consultation, currently open for comments, covers some significant aspects of dispute resolution in employment Relocation, relocationA recent decision explores the matters to consider when one parent wants to relocate abroad along with their child Worse than the disease?Has the UK quietly outlawed "alternative" medicine through the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations? Sleeping bountyThe Scottish Community Foundation has a scheme to breathe new life into dormant charitable trusts Scottish Solicitors' Discipline TribunalReports relating to Eileen Agnes Coogans; Zosia Marion Elizabeth Fraser; Annaline Webster; Ian Samuel Gerard Donnelly; Mark David Sheppard Website reviewsReviews of sites of organisations concerned with domain name disputes Book reviewsReview of Child and Family Law (Sutherland) Industry standardA survey south of the border suggests that in-house work in commerce and industry doesn't always match expectations - but most in-house lawyers expect to stay Meet the committeeProfile of In-house Lawyers Group committee member Sara Scott What's in a motto?A sample of In-house Lawyers Group members' notarial mottoes, collected by ILG secretary Tricia Sim Leasing by example"Green leases" appear to be some way off yet for the UK, but a Canadian model now published shows how they might work Good call?Reply to article questioning the Donald Trump planning application call-in argues that the decision is both competent and consistent with proper operation of the system Home reports - the practice questionsOpen letter over reservations as to the Society's proposed guidelines on the operation of home reports, in so far as they deal with conflict of interest |