The Journal, November 2005, page 47
In an effort to provide greater clarity and awareness of future regulatory changes, the government last year introduced common commencement dates (CCDs) for domestic employment legislation. The idea behind them was to help with planning and budgeting for new measures.
The CCDs which have been put in place for domestic employment legislation are 6 April and 1 October. This year, 1 October saw a number of new provisions come into force including increases in the national minimum wage (from £4.85 to £5.05 per hour for those aged over 21 and from £4.10 to £4.25 for 18-21 year olds); changes to the legislation on industrial action notices and ballots; and a new definition of harassment which incorporates both sexual harassment (such as unwanted sexual advances) and harassment related to a person’s sex (but which need not be sexual in its nature).
In addition, a number of minor technical changes and corrections were made to the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004, and prescribed ET1 and ET3 forms became mandatory. You should note that these are different from the versions of the forms which were originally released last year and, should you fail to use them, your client’s claim or response will not be accepted by the tribunal.
So, having got over the flurry of activity surrounding 1 October, you would be forgiven for thinking you could rest easy until 6 April 2006 when the long-awaited, amended TUPE Regulations are expected. However, it is not to be.
Two new sets of legislation – relating to civil partnerships and disability discrimination – are due to commence in early December.
When the provisions of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (“CPA 2004”) come into force on 5 December 2005, same-sex couples will be permitted to form a civil partnership by registering as civil partners. Section 251 of the CPA 2004 amends section 3 of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 in order to extend the marital discrimination provisions to those who have concluded a civil partnership. The CPA 2004 and the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (Amendments to Subordinate Legislation) Order 2005 (SI 2005/2114) work to ensure that those forming a civil partnership will have similar rights and responsibilities to married couples.
At the moment regulation 25 of the Sexual Orientation Regulations permits discrimination in the provision of benefits in favour of someone who is married. From 5 December 2005, access to a benefit by reference to marital status will still be permissible where the right to the benefit accrued, or the benefit is to be paid in respect of periods of service, prior to the coming into force of the CPA 2004. However, from that date it will only be possible to confer future benefits on married persons if those in civil partnerships are also offered the benefit. The new legislation will also extend the requirement to pay survivor pension benefits to the civil partner of a deceased scheme member.
Finally on the civil partnership provisions, the 2005 Order extends entitlement to paternity leave and pay, and adoption leave and pay, to civil partners, who will also be able to benefit from the right to request flexible working arrangements contained in the Flexible Working (Eligibility, Complaints and Remedies) Regulations 2002.
On the disability discrimination front, the Department for Work and Pensions has confirmed that certain of the provisions of the Disability Discrimination Act 2005 will come into force on 5 December 2005. These include extending the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (“DDA 1995”) to cover people with progressive conditions such as HIV infection, cancer or multiple sclerosis from the point of diagnosis; ending the requirement that a mental illness must be “clinically well-recognised” before it can be regarded as an impairment under the DDA 1995; and introducing for Part 3 of the DDA 1995 (i.e. access to goods and services, public authorities, private clubs and premises) a questionnaire procedure similar to that which already exists in Part 2 (employment and occupation).
Finally, the smoking ban comes into force on 26 March 2006. This will require employers in Scotland to rethink the provision of smoking facilities for staff, and ensure training is given in order to minimise the risk of being found liable for the actions of employees.
After you have managed to deal with all of that, there should be just time before 6 April to draw breath and consider whether the government aim of greater clarity has been achieved.
Jane Fraser, Head of Employment, Maclay Murray & Spens
Current Issue FeaturesBraving the stormHow different types of legal firm are coping with the current economic downturn, and how they see their future Civil justice: where next?An abridged version of the keynote address delivered to the conference on civil justice held in Edinburgh on 20 June Title Conditions Act: new registration proceduresNew procedures are in place for deeds intended to create new real burdens, to assist solicitors in complying with the requirement for dual registration Young lawyers rebornInterview with Scottish Young Lawyers Association President Maryam Labaki on SYLA's ambitions as it relaunches Shining some more light...Second part of overview of this year's Finance Act looks at the provisions on savings, pensions, residence/domicile and business taxes, among others Power to the tribunal?An advocate's and a solicitor's views of how the Scottish Government's proposed reforms to arbitration law might work in practice Piece by pieceA progress report from England & Wales on the setting up of the complex regulatory machinery under the Legal Services Act 2007 The poor in our midstInterview with Scottish Solicitors' Benevolent Fund convener Craig Bennet, who aims to raise awareness of the Fund so it can provide more help to those in need Current Issue ArticlesShifting sandsPresident's message: with economic issues dominating the profession's thoughts, the Society is taking steps to provide advice and support to those in need A rank bad ruleOpinion by two advocates that the Faculty's response to the OFT does its members a disservice by defending the cab rank rule and by resisting the use of ABS The Society's future role in complaints handlingA reminder, in the light of reactions to the first levy issued on behalf of the new Complaints Commission, of when and how the Society's responsibilities are changing Appreciation: Lord JohnstonReport of the tribute paid in court by the Lord President Professional Practice CommitteeNew guidelines on acting as a company director; and document control and file tracking Facing the lean yearsSome advice on how to pull through a recession and be ready for the next upturn, as word goes round of legal firms looking at staff cuts and other measures (part 1 of 2) It's a web 2.0 worldThe interactive nature of web 2.0 technology presents business opportunities, while posing new risks for those with inadequate precautions as to employee internet use Questions, questionsIn reviewing their risk profiles and risk controls, all firms might benefit from conducting a self-assessment by addressing questions put by some insurers elsewhere Bare necessitiesLatest criminal cases, including offensive weapons; Moorov rule; withdrawal of representation; evidence of a deceased; contempt of court by solicitor Coming on the blind sideA technical-sounding consultation, currently open for comments, covers some significant aspects of dispute resolution in employment Relocation, relocationA recent decision explores the matters to consider when one parent wants to relocate abroad along with their child Worse than the disease?Has the UK quietly outlawed "alternative" medicine through the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations? Sleeping bountyThe Scottish Community Foundation has a scheme to breathe new life into dormant charitable trusts Scottish Solicitors' Discipline TribunalReports relating to Eileen Agnes Coogans; Zosia Marion Elizabeth Fraser; Annaline Webster; Ian Samuel Gerard Donnelly; Mark David Sheppard Website reviewsReviews of sites of organisations concerned with domain name disputes Book reviewsReview of Child and Family Law (Sutherland) Industry standardA survey south of the border suggests that in-house work in commerce and industry doesn't always match expectations - but most in-house lawyers expect to stay Meet the committeeProfile of In-house Lawyers Group committee member Sara Scott What's in a motto?A sample of In-house Lawyers Group members' notarial mottoes, collected by ILG secretary Tricia Sim Leasing by example"Green leases" appear to be some way off yet for the UK, but a Canadian model now published shows how they might work Good call?Reply to article questioning the Donald Trump planning application call-in argues that the decision is both competent and consistent with proper operation of the system Home reports - the practice questionsOpen letter over reservations as to the Society's proposed guidelines on the operation of home reports, in so far as they deal with conflict of interest |