The Journal, December 2005, page 55
A complaint was made by the Council of the Law Society of Scotland against Nicandro Matteo, solicitor, 71 South Bridge, Airdrie (“the respondent”). The Tribunal found the respondent guilty of professional misconduct in respect of his failure to respond to the reasonable requests of the Society for information and failure to respond to statutory notices. The Tribunal censured the respondent.
The Tribunal has made it clear on countless occasions that failure to respond to the Law Society of Scotland seriously inconveniences the Society in the performance of its statutory duty, is prejudicial to the reputation of the legal profession and clearly amounts to professional misconduct. The Tribunal however took into account the circumstances in this case and was satisfied that this was an isolated incident. The failure to respond related to one matter and it was clear from the eminent references provided that this conduct was out of character for the respondent. In the circumstances the Tribunal was satisfied that a censure together with the usual order for expenses and publicity would be sufficient penalty in this case.
A complaint was made by the Council of the Law Society of Scotland against Alexander Gilmour Malcolm, solicitor, formerly of 23 Tarvit Drive, Cupar and now at 14 Melgund Place, Lochgelly, Fife (“the respondent”). The Tribunal found the respondent guilty of professional misconduct in respect of his act of deception by providing his client with deliberately untrue information contrary to article 7 of the Code of Conduct for Solicitors holding practising certificates, issued by the Law Society of Scotland in 2002. The Tribunal censured the respondent and directed in terms of section 53(5) of the Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1980 that for a period of five years any practising certificate held or issued to the respondent shall be subject to such restriction as will limit him to acting as a qualified assistant to such employer as may be approved by the Council or the Practising Certificate Committee of the Council of the Law Society of Scotland.
In this case the respondent misled his client by stating to his client that he had carried out a particular act where in fact he had not done so and was aware that he had not done so. This caused his client distress and inconvenience. The Tribunal was of the view that this clearly amounted to professional misconduct. The respondent had previously been found guilty of professional misconduct by the Tribunal in connection with analogous matters, although the Tribunal noted that the events in the complaint were proximate in time to the conduct concerned in the previous findings. The respondent was already subject to a restriction on his practising certificate until August 2007. The Tribunal considered that the most appropriate way of dealing with the case was to increase the length of the respondent’s restriction.
Current Issue FeaturesBraving the stormHow different types of legal firm are coping with the current economic downturn, and how they see their future Civil justice: where next?An abridged version of the keynote address delivered to the conference on civil justice held in Edinburgh on 20 June Title Conditions Act: new registration proceduresNew procedures are in place for deeds intended to create new real burdens, to assist solicitors in complying with the requirement for dual registration Young lawyers rebornInterview with Scottish Young Lawyers Association President Maryam Labaki on SYLA's ambitions as it relaunches Shining some more light...Second part of overview of this year's Finance Act looks at the provisions on savings, pensions, residence/domicile and business taxes, among others Power to the tribunal?An advocate's and a solicitor's views of how the Scottish Government's proposed reforms to arbitration law might work in practice Piece by pieceA progress report from England & Wales on the setting up of the complex regulatory machinery under the Legal Services Act 2007 The poor in our midstInterview with Scottish Solicitors' Benevolent Fund convener Craig Bennet, who aims to raise awareness of the Fund so it can provide more help to those in need Current Issue ArticlesShifting sandsPresident's message: with economic issues dominating the profession's thoughts, the Society is taking steps to provide advice and support to those in need A rank bad ruleOpinion by two advocates that the Faculty's response to the OFT does its members a disservice by defending the cab rank rule and by resisting the use of ABS The Society's future role in complaints handlingA reminder, in the light of reactions to the first levy issued on behalf of the new Complaints Commission, of when and how the Society's responsibilities are changing Appreciation: Lord JohnstonReport of the tribute paid in court by the Lord President Professional Practice CommitteeNew guidelines on acting as a company director; and document control and file tracking Facing the lean yearsSome advice on how to pull through a recession and be ready for the next upturn, as word goes round of legal firms looking at staff cuts and other measures (part 1 of 2) It's a web 2.0 worldThe interactive nature of web 2.0 technology presents business opportunities, while posing new risks for those with inadequate precautions as to employee internet use Questions, questionsIn reviewing their risk profiles and risk controls, all firms might benefit from conducting a self-assessment by addressing questions put by some insurers elsewhere Bare necessitiesLatest criminal cases, including offensive weapons; Moorov rule; withdrawal of representation; evidence of a deceased; contempt of court by solicitor Coming on the blind sideA technical-sounding consultation, currently open for comments, covers some significant aspects of dispute resolution in employment Relocation, relocationA recent decision explores the matters to consider when one parent wants to relocate abroad along with their child Worse than the disease?Has the UK quietly outlawed "alternative" medicine through the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations? Sleeping bountyThe Scottish Community Foundation has a scheme to breathe new life into dormant charitable trusts Scottish Solicitors' Discipline TribunalReports relating to Eileen Agnes Coogans; Zosia Marion Elizabeth Fraser; Annaline Webster; Ian Samuel Gerard Donnelly; Mark David Sheppard Website reviewsReviews of sites of organisations concerned with domain name disputes Book reviewsReview of Child and Family Law (Sutherland) Industry standardA survey south of the border suggests that in-house work in commerce and industry doesn't always match expectations - but most in-house lawyers expect to stay Meet the committeeProfile of In-house Lawyers Group committee member Sara Scott What's in a motto?A sample of In-house Lawyers Group members' notarial mottoes, collected by ILG secretary Tricia Sim Leasing by example"Green leases" appear to be some way off yet for the UK, but a Canadian model now published shows how they might work Good call?Reply to article questioning the Donald Trump planning application call-in argues that the decision is both competent and consistent with proper operation of the system Home reports - the practice questionsOpen letter over reservations as to the Society's proposed guidelines on the operation of home reports, in so far as they deal with conflict of interest |