A world turned upside down
by David CanningThe Chancellor's volte-face over self-invested personal pensions, and its effect
The Journal, January 2006, page 18
“Astonished,” “gobsmacked” and “astounded” are words rarely used in the financial services industry, particularly so in relation to pension planning. However, on Tuesday 5 December I found myself using these and one or two others that are not so printable when Gordon Brown effectively closed the door to pension funds investing directly in residential property.
What is perhaps most galling is the manner in which the announcement was made. Gordon Brown stated in his pre-Budget speech that the government would move to prevent abuses of the new rules. This seemed a very innocuous statement. Indeed many commentators in the financial services industry have, myself included, penned various articles outlining the pros and cons of residential property as an investment and of course the position should any individual make personal use of the underlying asset. However, when reading the finer details of the technical note it became very clear that Chancellor Brown is using a sledgehammer to crack a very small nut.
Tearing up its own plan
It has to be remembered that the move to relax the rules to allow the investment in residential property did not originate from the financial services industry but in fact came direct from the government. Despite concerns raised throughout what has been one of the most extensive consultation exercises ever, it was confirmed in the Finance Act 2004 that these new investment rules would be introduced. The government has since had numerous opportunities to introduce other changes but failed to do so, and has left it to the last possible moment to make what must be one of the most embarrassing U-turns of recent times.
So what exactly has Gordon Brown announced? The pre-Budget report technical note (which can be found at www.hmrc.gov.uk/pbr2005/pensions-simplification.pdf) confirmed that from “A-Day” the government will remove the tax advantages for investing in residential property or certain other assets such as fine wines etc. Effectively, this change means that the purchase of a residential property will be treated as an “unauthorised member payment” and will be subject to a charge, basically recouping all the tax relief given on the monies used to buy the property.
In stark terms
What does this mean in real terms and what “charges” would apply? The member will be subject to an income tax charge of 40% on the value of the property and potentially a further 15% (unauthorised payment surcharge) if the value of the asset is more than 25% of the overall pension fund. The scheme administrator will be liable to a scheme sanction charge of 15% of the value of the property and the scheme could also risk being de-registered, which would lead to a further tax charge on the scheme administrator at the rate of 40% of the value of the scheme assets.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist or a pension consultant to explain that, unless there are further amendments/U-turns made by the government, this certainly puts paid to holding residential property as a viable long-term investment within a SIPP.
For those potential investors who have (as the legislation permits) invested in off-plan purchases in the run-up to A-Day, the government has allowed transitional protection from the new rules. However this is on the basis that the off-plan investment does not become a residential property, i.e. the member will not face any tax charges as long as they sell their property before it becomes habitable. Easier said than done.
The last word?
The pension industry, as you can imagine, has not taken kindly to this announcement. As additional primary legislation will be required to effect these changes, the hope is that the industry can lobby to introduce a more sensible and targeted approach to the prevention of abuse rather than the sweeping all-inclusive approach so far favoured by Gordon Brown. Whether this will be achieved is debatable but I don’t think we have yet heard the end of this.
David Canning, Head of Pensions, Campbell Dallas Financial Services Ltd
t: 0141 942 6060
Current Issue FeaturesOn the scentInterview with Jane Irvine, Chair of the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission, on how the new body will operate and keep itself informed on legal practice Learning to live togetherA look at relations between the Law Society of England & Wales and its split-off bodies now dealing with professional regulation and complaints against solicitors Learning to live apartParenting classes for the newly separated, now common in the USA, are about to be trialled in Scotland, following a visit by Texan divorce coach Christina McGhee ARTL: one lender's viewMaking ARTL work; sites of special scientific interest; form 4 procedure Games without frontiersThe legal framework governing broadcasting rights for major sporting events, the prospects for change and the competing interests at stake Speaking up for childrenThe joint report by the four UK Children's Commissioners to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child provides a reality check for government and should dispel complacency Poor relations?Family businesses are feeling hard done by when it comes to finding professional advice that fully understands their needs, and are organising to press for action on training Justice for sale?Paper to a conference on delivering excellence in Scotland's civil justice system challenges the treatment of justice as a "commodity" Shining light into the darknessFirst of two articles on the Budget and Finance Bill explains the important changes in income tax, inheritance tax and capital gains tax Current Issue ArticlesCrunch timePresident's message: the Society is pressing for government action to mitigate the effects of the economic slowdown where it particularly hits solicitors' firms Home reports: oh no they won'tDefence of the author's views on home reports following previous replies Recoverable proceedsComment on part of the article "Dirty Money?", June 2008, p18 on recovering proceeds of crime Justice divertedOpinion that continued experience of summary justice diversion tends to contradict assertions that it is simply an efficient alternative to prosecution leading to a fine Legal aid review gets down to workSociety's letter to criminal practitioners on its work with the Scottish Government and others to monitor implementation of the summary legal aid changes CPD for new lawyersHow the Society is developing CPD training specifically for the needs of recently qualified solicitors Professional Practice CommitteeText of guideline on settlement by cheque, loan redemption and remit of the free proceeds of sale 2008 Time to sell up?Second and final part of the author's acocunt of lessons learnt from selling his legal practice: best strategies in concluding a sale, and how to prepare for what comes after Beyond chip and PINReport on a project which aims to guarantee the security of electronic signatures such as used in the ARTL system, for use in any legal transaction concluded over the internet Lender claimsWith a downturn in the property market increasing the risk of claims from lenders for losses suffered through mortgage default, the article examines how to minimise this The price of justiceLatest civil cases, including inordinate delay; third party notice; new defender; and three decisions on aspects of expenses Transition talesAnomalies and inconsistencies in practice under the new licensing regime would be greatly added to if some of the latest government proposals come to pass Falling between stoolsCourt rules place unnecessary obstacles in the way of separating cohabitants who wish to make a counter application for financial provision The Environment v XRegulations are pending that will introduce new duties to avoid, or remedy, damage to the environment - and it can sue More equal than others?Two English cases appear to settle the question of which creditors are entitled to share under the new "prescribed part" provisions Points to proveThe next phase of the points-based immigration system will come into force shortly, with the rules applying to skilled workers with a job offer Website reviewsReviews of sites covering news of matters relating to Scots law and lawyers Book reviewsReviews of Gloag & Henderson (12th ed); Evidence (Davidson) Whose star will shine?In-house lawyers have the chance to see their unique talents recognised through the latest expansion of The Signet Accreditation Taken for grantedThe Society has issued advice to in-house lawyers over the granting of a non domino dispositions in favour of their employers An A to G of EPCsWith energy performance certificates about to arrive across the property market, the author explains what they require, and some issues they raise particularly in letting |