The Journal, February 2006, page 50
In light of the letter from Mr Paterson published in the January edition at page 10, the Keeper considers that it might be helpful to provide information about the Agency’s target for first registration turnaround times.
At present there are three ministerial targets related to first registration (FR) turnaround times. The first of these is:
To achieve registration turnaround times in 2005-2006 averaging over the year as a whole no more than 90 working days for domestic first registrations received over the last 12 months.
The second target particularly focuses on any domestic applications that have been with the Agency for more than 12 months. This is:
In line with the three year target to eliminate stocks of domestic first registrations over one year old, to achieve a 62% stock reduction against the 31 March 2004 baseline by 31 March 2006.
The third target relates to older, more complex work. This is:
To eliminate all pre-July 2001 casework except where, for exceptional reasons, agreement has been reached with the agent or where court proceedings are pending.
Since the mid-1990s, the Keeper has categorised all applications for FR according to their complexity. There are seven mainstream categories, ranging from a straightforward red-edged plot with burdens that are common to a number of properties, to complex casework made up of commercial and large rural estates. The categorisation of casework allows the appropriate allocation of resource to reflect the complexity of the registration. In the lowest category of work we use technology to map the title plan and populate the burdens section of the title sheet, automatically. We turn around this category of casework faster than those requiring a more detailed analysis by a senior registration officer. Consequently, turnaround times vary depending on the complexity of the individual application and the work involved in completing the registration process.
The first target aims to ensure that the Keeper processes recently received FRs in a limited period of time. This target is aimed at the less complex FR applications which we classify internally as “domestic”. This allows the Keeper to ensure that the majority of relatively straightforward FR applications that are usually less complex and primarily involve only domestic property are processed within a reasonable period of time.
Current performance against this target indicates that FR applications received in the last year are being processed in an average timescale of 70 working days. However, this figure does fluctuate from county to county, reflecting some of the difficulties that can be encountered as a result of the mapping or conveyancing complexities that arise in different areas.
The performance against this target sets a standard for all recently received applications of this type, but the Keeper is also addressing older, primarily more complex FRs, together with any remaining domestic applications which have been delayed for whatever reason. The complex work in particular can be very time consuming and requires the skills and expertise from our most senior and experienced, and therefore most limited, resources. It became clear some years ago that FR applications could rise to a peak as the counties went live on the Land Register, then begin to subside. We have now passed this peak which we reached earlier than anticipated, possibly due to the buoyant housing market. Over the last two years it has been clear that overall FR applications are now showing a year on year decline as the balance of intakes shifts more towards dealings with whole and transfers of part applications. This offers the opportunity to make significant advances to reduce existing backlogs of FRs, in line with the second target.
Recognising the importance of clearing older casework and the difficulties it causes the profession, the Keeper is working hard to reduce the existing stock of FRs and ultimately improve turnaround times for FRs overall, regardless of complexity. To encourage this, the second target is focused at domestic FR applications over one year old.
Our arrears of the most complex types of application fall mainly into the category of commercial transactions requiring very detailed consideration and correspondence before registration can be completed. We have recently restructured to provide a greater focus within the respective business units responsible for this type of casework, ensuring that it is processed as quickly as individual circumstances permit.
The drive to improve our position in this regard is supported by the third target. This encompasses all applications held by the Keeper and aims to deliver a clear indication of the maximum possible time taken to process any application for registration. We hope progressively to adjust this year on year to ensure delivery of a turnaround time for all FR applications of whatever type at more appropriate levels.
The Keeper wishes to review the quarterly publication of Keeper’s Corner in The Journal and invites views from the profession.
Keeper’s Corner was conceived to provide a regular forum for keeping the profession informed of developments at Registers of Scotland. In recent years, the scale and pace of change have increased dramatically. This has mainly been due to the advent of the devolved Scottish Parliament and the significant legislative programme that has been delivered since 1999. The changes brought about by the land reform, feudal abolition and title conditions legislation, and other developments such as ARTL, have required a more regular flow of communication in The Journal rather than simply waiting until the next quarterly publication of Keeper’s Corner.
The Keeper would be interested to learn the profession’s views on whether or not the Keeper’s Corner format continues to be useful.
The Keeper also invites suggestions as to any items that might usefully be included on a regular basis (if Keeper’s Corner is retained), such as novel points that have arisen in references to the Pre-registration Enquiries Section or in the settlement of more complex casework. Turnaround times could also be published quarterly in Keeper’s Corner instead of monthly as at present and with more information on first registrations and older, more complex applications.
Comments or suggestions will be most welcome and should be made to either: customerservices@ros.gov.uk or alan.malone@ros.gov.uk
Bruce Beveridge, Deputy Keeper
Current Issue FeaturesBraving the stormHow different types of legal firm are coping with the current economic downturn, and how they see their future Civil justice: where next?An abridged version of the keynote address delivered to the conference on civil justice held in Edinburgh on 20 June Title Conditions Act: new registration proceduresNew procedures are in place for deeds intended to create new real burdens, to assist solicitors in complying with the requirement for dual registration Young lawyers rebornInterview with Scottish Young Lawyers Association President Maryam Labaki on SYLA's ambitions as it relaunches Shining some more light...Second part of overview of this year's Finance Act looks at the provisions on savings, pensions, residence/domicile and business taxes, among others Power to the tribunal?An advocate's and a solicitor's views of how the Scottish Government's proposed reforms to arbitration law might work in practice Piece by pieceA progress report from England & Wales on the setting up of the complex regulatory machinery under the Legal Services Act 2007 The poor in our midstInterview with Scottish Solicitors' Benevolent Fund convener Craig Bennet, who aims to raise awareness of the Fund so it can provide more help to those in need Current Issue ArticlesShifting sandsPresident's message: with economic issues dominating the profession's thoughts, the Society is taking steps to provide advice and support to those in need A rank bad ruleOpinion by two advocates that the Faculty's response to the OFT does its members a disservice by defending the cab rank rule and by resisting the use of ABS The Society's future role in complaints handlingA reminder, in the light of reactions to the first levy issued on behalf of the new Complaints Commission, of when and how the Society's responsibilities are changing Appreciation: Lord JohnstonReport of the tribute paid in court by the Lord President Professional Practice CommitteeNew guidelines on acting as a company director; and document control and file tracking Facing the lean yearsSome advice on how to pull through a recession and be ready for the next upturn, as word goes round of legal firms looking at staff cuts and other measures (part 1 of 2) It's a web 2.0 worldThe interactive nature of web 2.0 technology presents business opportunities, while posing new risks for those with inadequate precautions as to employee internet use Questions, questionsIn reviewing their risk profiles and risk controls, all firms might benefit from conducting a self-assessment by addressing questions put by some insurers elsewhere Bare necessitiesLatest criminal cases, including offensive weapons; Moorov rule; withdrawal of representation; evidence of a deceased; contempt of court by solicitor Coming on the blind sideA technical-sounding consultation, currently open for comments, covers some significant aspects of dispute resolution in employment Relocation, relocationA recent decision explores the matters to consider when one parent wants to relocate abroad along with their child Worse than the disease?Has the UK quietly outlawed "alternative" medicine through the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations? Sleeping bountyThe Scottish Community Foundation has a scheme to breathe new life into dormant charitable trusts Scottish Solicitors' Discipline TribunalReports relating to Eileen Agnes Coogans; Zosia Marion Elizabeth Fraser; Annaline Webster; Ian Samuel Gerard Donnelly; Mark David Sheppard Website reviewsReviews of sites of organisations concerned with domain name disputes Book reviewsReview of Child and Family Law (Sutherland) Industry standardA survey south of the border suggests that in-house work in commerce and industry doesn't always match expectations - but most in-house lawyers expect to stay Meet the committeeProfile of In-house Lawyers Group committee member Sara Scott What's in a motto?A sample of In-house Lawyers Group members' notarial mottoes, collected by ILG secretary Tricia Sim Leasing by example"Green leases" appear to be some way off yet for the UK, but a Canadian model now published shows how they might work Good call?Reply to article questioning the Donald Trump planning application call-in argues that the decision is both competent and consistent with proper operation of the system Home reports - the practice questionsOpen letter over reservations as to the Society's proposed guidelines on the operation of home reports, in so far as they deal with conflict of interest |