Nearly 30 years after its debut the Imperial Army is set for battle again. The instantly recognisable white skulled helmets and armoured spacesuits worn by the Stormtroopers in the Star Wars trilogy have entered into movie history. However the right to manufacture and sell replicas of the costumes has created a copyright storm. Lucasfilm Ltd has raised proceedings in London against Shepperton Studios to enforce a United States decision of copyright and trade mark infringement in the UK. The British design studio is now preparing to strike back against the claims.
The recent United States action brought by Lucasfilm Ltd in California found Shepperton Studios guilty of copyright infringement for their sale of Stormtrooper helmets and costumes. The design studio, based in Middlesex, offers both replica battle helmets and body armour for sale. Lucasfilm Ltd sued the British firm for the marketing and sale of unlicensed Star Wars memorabilia. They claimed that the British design studio was distributing unlicensed Star Wars products and in addition making misleading claims as to their authenticity. Lucasfilm Ltd was awarded $20 million in damages and Shepperton Studios were banned from copying, reproducing, importing, licensing or marketing Star Wars products in the United States. Lucasfilm is now seeking to have the judgment enforced in the UK to prevent further sales of the costumes.
However matters are not that simple. Shepperton Studios produced some of the first helmets and body armours for the original Star Wars films back in the 1970s. Mr Ainsworth of Shepperton Studios claims he did not have a contract with George Lucas governing production of the costumes and that he has never surrendered his rights over the designs. Further, this is no attack of the clones as he is continuing to use the original moulds. On the other hand Lucasfilms alleges such claims are misleading and that Shepperton has no rights in the designs. It claims that as Shepperton is not entitled to recreate the costumes, this constitutes copyright infringement.
Copyright in the UK is governed by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Under these provisions copyright will attach to the author of any original literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work. The original designs of the Stormtrooper costumes may well be protected as an artistic work under this regime. Such copyright protection is not limited to two-dimensional drawings and has extended to items as diverse as jewellery and toys. Previously the costumes and prostheses for the film Frankenstein have gained the protection of copyright. If copyright protection is established for the Stormtroopers costumes it entitles the author to the sole right to copy the work for a period of 70 years. Any unauthorised copying by inference amounts to infringement.
Matters consequently turn on establishing who the author is. In most cases the author of the work is the creator, who automatically obtains copyright protection. However an exception to this principle is where the work was created in the course of the author's employment. Such an exception could only be invoked here if Mr Ainsworth was an employee of George Lucas. In this case it appears that while Shepperton Studios were hired to create the helmets, Mr Ainsworth was not an actual employee. Much will depend on whether there was an actual written contract and in the absence of this what was verbally agreed between parties. These are all matters of fact which would need to be established by a court.
Given the tight control Lucasfilms now exerts over its intellectual property rights, such a potential loophole would never transpire today. Indeed all businesses should ensure that they have contracts in place to govern the supply of services by direct employees or other companies providing a service. This is particularly critical where it involves the design of a new product or service and authorship issues may arise.
While the film industry provides ample examples of easily identifiable objects (light-sabres and the Batman and Superman costumes to name a few), there is no need to prove that an item is well known in order for copyright to attach. All that is required is for it to be original and this could as easily extend to items such as architectural plans, toys and furniture. Copyright infringement has the potential to impact on a wide range of industries.
Given that a Stormtroopers costume retails for around £1,500 it is a lucrative business, and the latest saga in Star Wars history looks set to run.
Colin Hulme is an associate in the Glasgow office of Burness LLP
Current Submissions11.03.08 One Scotland, many cultures?Despite the protections of the Human Rights Act, the position of travelling people in Scotland appears to have worsened in recent years - why? 26.02.08 Bank charges and the Unfair Terms RegulationsThe significance of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations in the context of the current litigation over bank charges 21.02.08 CGT: Don't lose out on 6 April 2008Couples should consider asset transfers before then to preserve indexation relief 14.12.07 Common sense prevailsThe options open, and the issues that arise, now that the proposed planning gain supplement is not to be introduced 07.12.07 Discounting justiceAuthor contends that sentencing discounts and other developments have created an imbalance in the justice system 10.10.07 Advocacy in mediationAn overview of the mediation process and the opportunities for solicitors and clients 06.09.07 TUPE: stay your handA Court of Session ruling on a law firm redundancy marks a fundamental change in TUPE 24.07.07 EAT breaks ground with TUPE insolvency rulingRuling on when insolvency proceedings begin leaves successor employer liable 06.07.07 Confidentiality clauses - beware!The Information Commissioner's decision in the VisitScotland case requires very careful drafting of confidentiality provisions in public sector contracts if they are to work 06.07.07 The power of marks: Frankie goes after Hollys nameHow failure to address issues of ownership of the band's name stored up trouble for Frankie Goes to Hollywood 14.05.07 Court plans with little appealThe fuller version of the Opinion article in the Journal for May 2007 14.05.07 Winning waysThe fuller version of the article in the Journal for May 2007 08.02.07 Routes to qualification: the Italian pictureAn Italian lawyer with an interest in training in different jurisdictions reports on current developments in the Italian legal system 09.01.07 Contractual handcuffs: enhanced redundancy rightsThe Court of Appeal decision in Keeley v FOSROC International Ltd requires employers to exercise caution when referring to redundancy rights in staff handbooks 27.12.06 The Isle of ManAn summary of the current legal and tax regime for individuals and companies based on the island (a longer version of the briefing in the November 2006 issue) 15.11.06 Costume Wars: copyright storm over the troopersA row over "Star Wars" costumes illustrates the need to protect all intellectual property rights in written agreements 13.10.06 Survival of the fittest? A replyReply to article on selection for Diploma and traineeship places by Michael Torrance in the September 2006 Journal 13.10.06 TUPE passes the buckFar from providing clarity, the new regulations will need litigation to decide the effect of the insolvency provisions (longer version of October 2006 briefing article) 17.08.06 For supplement read tax - an updateAuthors update their previous Journal article on the proposed planning gain supplement 17.08.06 Technology and the Scottish courtsAn update on the use of technology in the Scottish courts, based on the author's experience of a recent patent case 26.07.06 A lack of trustForthcoming in August issue, put online because of its urgency, the article outlines the final form of the trust tax changes in this year's Finance Act 17.07.06 Ireland 4, Italy 0The ECJ decision in the Irish-Italian dispute in the Parmalat companies liquidation proceedings provides important guidance on jurisdiction 05.04.06 Legal science or law-lite? A responseThis reply to Professor Gretton argues that changes in Scots law teaching are a necessary response to changes in universities, the wider community and the law itself 03.04.06 Opening a binding global route for personal dataIn a significant move the Information Commissioner has allowed a company to transfer employees' personal data outwith the EU under binding internal rules 02.04.06 Mentally disordered offendersOverview of the options available to the courts when dealing with offenders who have or may have a mental disorder, following recent legislative reforms 30.03.06 Bias and mental health tribunals: a replyReply to criticisms of the new tribunals, arguing that the composition of the tribunals is not inherently unfair and only research can assess their performance 17.01.06 Legal aid in children's hearing referralsThis paper delivered at the legal aid conference, argues that the interests of justice require better remuneration for solicitors appearing in children's hearing cases 09.12.05 Holes in Scotland's corporate killing proposalsGaps in the expert working group's proposals could make them unworkable and bad for business 10.08.05 Prosecuting bigotry offencesTwo appeal decisions have exposed limitations in the statutory offences directed at racial abuse 08.07.05 Commissioner: Public Authorities must do moreInformation Commissioner's first appeal decision highlights areas for improvement 14.04.05 New identity for criminal justice bodyScottish Association for the Study of Offending launches by removing "Delinquency" from title 14.04.05 Information and Consultation RegulationsBriefing on the regulations in force from 6 April 2005, covering businesses with more than the prescribed number of employees 13.04.05 Retailers seek effective court action on crimeScottish Retail Consortium proposes more effective intervention following 3rd Retail Crime Survey 11.04.05 Appropriate dispute resolutionThis paper, given to the Four Jurisdictions Conference in Nice this year, discusses how family law can make a difference for the better by careful choice of the most suitable method of resolution 09.03.05 ASBOs and young peopleWhat to look for when acting for a young person facing an antisocial behaviour order application 21.02.05 Sell or transfer?Longer version of briefing published in February 2005 issue, page 44 08.02.05 Promoting competitiveness or competition?Discussion of EU rules on state aids with particular reference to Highlands and Islands ferries 10.11.04 Guarding the inner sanctumHow to minimise the risk of breaches of internet security 10.11.04 The Clinical Trials Directive - a summaryWhat the EU Clinical Trials Directive means for trials of medicinal products 13.10.04 Sheriff Court Rules Council consultation paperConsultation on proposals for further extension of the use of information technology in civil cases in the sheriff court (response date: 15 November 2004) 13.10.04 Ignorantia juris: it's all Greek to meSecond annual APEX lecture given by the President of the Law Society of Scotland, on the rule of law and its essential components 13.10.04 Virtual firms: transactional learning on the webHow today's Diploma students are introduced to legal transactions in a virtual environment 13.10.04 Drafting consumer contractsGuidance on drafting consumer contracts and ensuring compliance with the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 |