Counsel's fees - a reply
by George WayA reply to the open letter from the Dean of Faculty (Journal, June 2007) on the Scheme for Counsel's fees
The Journal, July 2007, page 26
George Way, Convener of the Society's Civil Procedure Committee, replies to the open letter from the Dean of the Faculty of Advocates published in last months journal (See June 2007 p12).
The learned Dean in his open letter on the Scheme for Counsel’s fees, with respect, does not address the underlying concerns of solicitors on this matter. The “scheme” is not merely a mechanism for mediating “sanctions”. It is a restrictive set of rules binding both solicitors and counsel in respect of matters such as speculative fees, deferred fees, method of challenge etc. But I think, more importantly, it papers over the cracks in a system which is not contemporary or fit for purpose.
The system of devolved stables is already bringing a new dynamic to the relationship between solicitors and counsel. There are discussions taking place relating to proposals as diverse as agreed hourly rates and commercially realistic fees for cancelled appearances. The fact that advocacy in ancient Rome was a gentlemanly pastime for those hoping for public office (and was therefore unpaid), and the observations of judges in Victorian cases such as Batchelor v Pattison and Mackersy (1876) 3 R 914, must now be read in light of more modern dicta: Rondel v Worsley [1969] 1 AC 191; Saif Ali v Sidney Mitchell & Co [1980] AC 198; and the opinion of the First Division in Wright v Farrell [2006] CSIH 7. Public policy may dictate that certain immunities must attach to advocacy, but it no longer needs to be linked to a fiction that members of the Faculty of Advocates are not paid for services rendered.
Why, in this day and age, should advocates (whilst preserving proper immunities necessary to ensure independence of thought and action in court) not be subject to service contracts, performance standards and the like? Solicitors with extended rights seem to be able to work under the yoke of contract, yet maintain due independence. Indeed, if the message from Richard Smith, the interim CEO of the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission, on the need to set standards ourselves (“if you don’t, we will!”) is heeded, the Bar desperately needs to shake itself or it will find that the SLCC decides what counsel should do for their fees. A proper contractual system may protect them from the worst ravages of inadequate professional services claims under the new regime; the Praetorian Guard will not!
At the June meeting of Council it was agreed that the Civil Procedure Committee be asked to make a recommendation on the future of the Scheme to the following Council meeting
Current Issue FeaturesBraving the stormHow different types of legal firm are coping with the current economic downturn, and how they see their future Civil justice: where next?An abridged version of the keynote address delivered to the conference on civil justice held in Edinburgh on 20 June Title Conditions Act: new registration proceduresNew procedures are in place for deeds intended to create new real burdens, to assist solicitors in complying with the requirement for dual registration Young lawyers rebornInterview with Scottish Young Lawyers Association President Maryam Labaki on SYLA's ambitions as it relaunches Shining some more light...Second part of overview of this year's Finance Act looks at the provisions on savings, pensions, residence/domicile and business taxes, among others Power to the tribunal?An advocate's and a solicitor's views of how the Scottish Government's proposed reforms to arbitration law might work in practice Piece by pieceA progress report from England & Wales on the setting up of the complex regulatory machinery under the Legal Services Act 2007 The poor in our midstInterview with Scottish Solicitors' Benevolent Fund convener Craig Bennet, who aims to raise awareness of the Fund so it can provide more help to those in need Current Issue ArticlesShifting sandsPresident's message: with economic issues dominating the profession's thoughts, the Society is taking steps to provide advice and support to those in need A rank bad ruleOpinion by two advocates that the Faculty's response to the OFT does its members a disservice by defending the cab rank rule and by resisting the use of ABS The Society's future role in complaints handlingA reminder, in the light of reactions to the first levy issued on behalf of the new Complaints Commission, of when and how the Society's responsibilities are changing Appreciation: Lord JohnstonReport of the tribute paid in court by the Lord President Professional Practice CommitteeNew guidelines on acting as a company director; and document control and file tracking Facing the lean yearsSome advice on how to pull through a recession and be ready for the next upturn, as word goes round of legal firms looking at staff cuts and other measures (part 1 of 2) It's a web 2.0 worldThe interactive nature of web 2.0 technology presents business opportunities, while posing new risks for those with inadequate precautions as to employee internet use Questions, questionsIn reviewing their risk profiles and risk controls, all firms might benefit from conducting a self-assessment by addressing questions put by some insurers elsewhere Bare necessitiesLatest criminal cases, including offensive weapons; Moorov rule; withdrawal of representation; evidence of a deceased; contempt of court by solicitor Coming on the blind sideA technical-sounding consultation, currently open for comments, covers some significant aspects of dispute resolution in employment Relocation, relocationA recent decision explores the matters to consider when one parent wants to relocate abroad along with their child Worse than the disease?Has the UK quietly outlawed "alternative" medicine through the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations? Sleeping bountyThe Scottish Community Foundation has a scheme to breathe new life into dormant charitable trusts Scottish Solicitors' Discipline TribunalReports relating to Eileen Agnes Coogans; Zosia Marion Elizabeth Fraser; Annaline Webster; Ian Samuel Gerard Donnelly; Mark David Sheppard Website reviewsReviews of sites of organisations concerned with domain name disputes Book reviewsReview of Child and Family Law (Sutherland) Industry standardA survey south of the border suggests that in-house work in commerce and industry doesn't always match expectations - but most in-house lawyers expect to stay Meet the committeeProfile of In-house Lawyers Group committee member Sara Scott What's in a motto?A sample of In-house Lawyers Group members' notarial mottoes, collected by ILG secretary Tricia Sim Leasing by example"Green leases" appear to be some way off yet for the UK, but a Canadian model now published shows how they might work Good call?Reply to article questioning the Donald Trump planning application call-in argues that the decision is both competent and consistent with proper operation of the system Home reports - the practice questionsOpen letter over reservations as to the Society's proposed guidelines on the operation of home reports, in so far as they deal with conflict of interest |