CGT: Don't lose out on 6 April 2008

Couples should consider asset transfers before then to preserve indexation relief


Over the last few months the Chancellor’s difficulties regarding Northern Rock, missing child benefit disks and how to tax non-domiciled UK residents, have occupied a lot of press attention.

These issues have been interesting enough, but they have deflected a lot of worthwhile attention away from the radical changes that are going to be made to capital gains tax (“CGT”) on 6 April 2008. Whilst the CGT changes will undoubtedly benefit some people, they will also adversely affect a significant number of others, particularly married couples and civil partners, unless pre-emptive action is taken before 6 April. Time is, therefore, very much of the essence.

It is impossible in an article of this length to run through all of the changes that are about to be made, so the sole purpose of this article is to focus on the immediate action that married couples and civil partners should take in order to bank what is potentially a very valuable tax relief, namely indexation relief.

Indexation relief was introduced in 1985 in order to prevent people paying CGT on inflationary gains. Put simply, the relief allows the base cost of an asset to be increased by inflation between when the asset was bought (or March 1982 if purchased before then) and April 1998.

The relief stopped in 1998 when the then Chancellor froze the benefit at the levels that had been built up by that date. Indexation relief was not abolished, however, so many people who have been selling shares, holiday homes or other assets over the last 10 years have been able to benefit from the indexation that they had earned up until 1998. The current reason for concern is that, in terms of the new rules, indexation relief will finally be abolished on 6 April.

The good news for married couples and civil partners is that it is possible for the accumulated benefit of indexation relief to be preserved. All that is needed is for one spouse or partner to gift the asset concerned to the other spouse or partner before 6 April.

As an example, if a holiday home costing £30,000 was bought in the husband’s name in the summer of 1982, that asset will now have a base cost including indexation of around £60,000. If no action is taken before 6 April, indexation will be lost and the base cost of the asset on any future sale will be restricted to the original £30,000. Transferring the house into the wife’s name before 6 April, however, secures the higher base cost of £60,000, which could ultimately result in a CGT saving of £5,400 on any future sale. The same principle applies to other assets held in either spouse’s sole name pre-April 1998.

Couples with holiday homes, buy-to-let properties or share portfolios should all consider whether they would benefit from taking action, but it is vital that action, where appropriate, is taken before 6 April 2008.  Don’t delay and miss out!

Tom Monteith is a partner in Bird Semple, Private Client Solicitors
t: 0141 304 3434
www.bsemple.com  

Current Submissions

Getting a Get in Scotland - 2

This follow-up to the article published in March 2006 explains how current Scots divorce law affects Jewish clients and how solicitors can give appropriate advice

No place for secrecy

Fuller version of the Opinion article, Journal, June 2008: critique of the system for appointment as Queen’s Counsel in Scotland

One Scotland, many cultures?

Despite the protections of the Human Rights Act, the position of travelling people in Scotland appears to have worsened in recent years - why?

Bank charges and the Unfair Terms Regulations

The significance of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations in the context of the current litigation over bank charges

CGT: Don't lose out on 6 April 2008

Couples should consider asset transfers before then to preserve indexation relief

Common sense prevails

The options open, and the issues that arise, now that the proposed planning gain supplement is not to be introduced

Discounting justice

Author contends that sentencing discounts and other developments have created an imbalance in the justice system

Advocacy in mediation

An overview of the mediation process and the opportunities for solicitors and clients

TUPE: stay your hand

A Court of Session ruling on a law firm redundancy marks a fundamental change in TUPE

EAT breaks ground with TUPE insolvency ruling

Ruling on when insolvency proceedings begin leaves successor employer liable

Confidentiality clauses - beware!

The Information Commissioner's decision in the VisitScotland case requires very careful drafting of confidentiality provisions in public sector contracts if they are to work

The power of marks: Frankie goes after Hollys name

How failure to address issues of ownership of the band's name stored up trouble for Frankie Goes to Hollywood

Court plans with little appeal

The fuller version of the Opinion article in the Journal for May 2007

Winning ways

The fuller version of the article in the Journal for May 2007

Routes to qualification: the Italian picture

An Italian lawyer with an interest in training in different jurisdictions reports on current developments in the Italian legal system

Contractual handcuffs: enhanced redundancy rights

The Court of Appeal decision in Keeley v FOSROC International Ltd requires employers to exercise caution when referring to redundancy rights in staff handbooks

The Isle of Man

An summary of the current legal and tax regime for individuals and companies based on the island (a longer version of the briefing in the November 2006 issue)

Costume Wars: copyright storm over the troopers

A row over "Star Wars" costumes illustrates the need to protect all intellectual property rights in written agreements

Survival of the fittest? A reply

Reply to article on selection for Diploma and traineeship places by Michael Torrance in the September 2006 Journal

TUPE passes the buck

Far from providing clarity, the new regulations will need litigation to decide the effect of the insolvency provisions (longer version of October 2006 briefing article)

For supplement read tax - an update

Authors update their previous Journal article on the proposed planning gain supplement

Technology and the Scottish courts

An update on the use of technology in the Scottish courts, based on the author's experience of a recent patent case

A lack of trust

Forthcoming in August issue, put online because of its urgency, the article outlines the final form of the trust tax changes in this year's Finance Act

Ireland 4, Italy 0

The ECJ decision in the Irish-Italian dispute in the Parmalat companies liquidation proceedings provides important guidance on jurisdiction

Legal science or law-lite? A response

This reply to Professor Gretton argues that changes in Scots law teaching are a necessary response to changes in universities, the wider community and the law itself

Opening a binding global route for personal data

In a significant move the Information Commissioner has allowed a company to transfer employees' personal data outwith the EU under binding internal rules

Mentally disordered offenders

Overview of the options available to the courts when dealing with offenders who have or may have a mental disorder, following recent legislative reforms

Bias and mental health tribunals: a reply

Reply to criticisms of the new tribunals, arguing that the composition of the tribunals is not inherently unfair and only research can assess their performance

Legal aid in children's hearing referrals

This paper delivered at the legal aid conference, argues that the interests of justice require better remuneration for solicitors appearing in children's hearing cases

Holes in Scotland's corporate killing proposals

Gaps in the expert working group's proposals could make them unworkable and bad for business

Prosecuting bigotry offences

Two appeal decisions have exposed limitations in the statutory offences directed at racial abuse

Commissioner: Public Authorities must do more

Information Commissioner's first appeal decision highlights areas for improvement

New identity for criminal justice body

Scottish Association for the Study of Offending launches by removing "Delinquency" from title

Information and Consultation Regulations

Briefing on the regulations in force from 6 April 2005, covering businesses with more than the prescribed number of employees

Retailers seek effective court action on crime

Scottish Retail Consortium proposes more effective intervention following 3rd Retail Crime Survey

Appropriate dispute resolution

This paper, given to the Four Jurisdictions Conference in Nice this year, discusses how family law can make a difference for the better by careful choice of the most suitable method of resolution

ASBOs and young people

What to look for when acting for a young person facing an antisocial behaviour order application

Sell or transfer?

Longer version of briefing published in February 2005 issue, page 44

Promoting competitiveness or competition?

Discussion of EU rules on state aids with particular reference to Highlands and Islands ferries

Guarding the inner sanctum

How to minimise the risk of breaches of internet security

The Clinical Trials Directive - a summary

What the EU Clinical Trials Directive means for trials of medicinal products

Sheriff Court Rules Council consultation paper

Consultation on proposals for further extension of the use of information technology in civil cases in the sheriff court (response date: 15 November 2004)

Ignorantia juris: it's all Greek to me

Second annual APEX lecture given by the President of the Law Society of Scotland, on the rule of law and its essential components

Virtual firms: transactional learning on the web

How today's Diploma students are introduced to legal transactions in a virtual environment

Drafting consumer contracts

Guidance on drafting consumer contracts and ensuring compliance with the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999