News In Focus

3 March 2006

CRO: time limit for making complaints

by Mary McGowan


A number of solicitors have raised questions about the important recent change to the Society’s policy on accepting complaints for investigation. I thought that this would be a good opportunity to clarify the Society’s position.

The Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1980, as amended by the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act 1990, does not set down any time limits on accepting complaints for investigation. However, the Council of the Law Society will, from time to time, issue guidelines on this matter.

After a review in 2001, it was agreed that the same time limit should apply for both complaints alleging professional misconduct and those alleging inadequate professional service. This limit was set at two years and therefore, in practice, the Society will consider any complaint made either within two years of the business being concluded or within two years from the date the complainer first became aware of the concerns giving rise to the complaint. The time limit may be relaxed in exceptional circumstances.

The Society’s guiding principle remains that it is best to investigate complaints as soon as possible after the event, as memories are fresh and paperwork is intact and available. This will give the best chance of a fair and thorough investigation and will enable the Society to deal with the complaint within a reasonable length of time.

Following a recent Scottish Solicitors’ Discipline Tribunal case, the Society has further refined its policy to make it clear that in making complaints outwith the two year time limit, complainers will need to demonstrate that they took all reasonable steps to find out whether they could make a complaint. This brings into play questions of reasonableness and the exercise of due diligence.

For example, if the Society receives a complaint alleging inadequate professional service about a conveyancing transaction that took place 10 years ago, the complainer will need to give details of how they became aware of the grounds for the complaint. If it is something the complainer should reasonably have known about or, acting reasonably, have taken steps to find out, the complaint will not be investigated.

Please note that this does not affect the time limits for endowment complaints. The time limit, in line with the Financial Services Authority, remains three years from the date of the complainer receiving the second letter from the insurance company warning of a potential shortfall.

News reel

Bail law held ultra vires

8 Feb 12

Condition requiring participation in ID parade infringes ECHR

Latest Society constitution plans out for views

8 Feb 12

Six-week period for responses ahead of proposed AGM vote

Brodies appoints two new partners

8 Feb 12

Firm recruits agricultural property and private client specialists

Unfair dismissal claim can be brought for work abroad

8 Feb 12

Supreme Court upholds worker's right to bring tribnal case

Human Rights Court upholds press freedoms

8 Feb 12

European judges reject privacy claims in German cases

Report backs press regulation

7 Feb 12

Carnegie UK Trust calls for independent regulator and code of ethics

New social housing powers outlined

7 Feb 12

Plans to prioritise needy and tackle antisocial behaviour

Ministers pledge procurement improvements

6 Feb 12

Review will seek to maximise openings for home-based businesses

McGrigors and Pinsents confirm merger

6 Feb 12

McGrigors name to disappear as partners approve plans

Planning rules eased

6 Feb 12

New regime aims to remove 4,000 applications per year

Society warns over HSBC mortgage documentation

6 Feb 12

Scottish borrowers' solicitors "should decline to engage"

Lord Reed sworn in at UK Supreme Court today

6 Feb 12

Court joins Twitter to mark the occasion

FILLER_lawscotjobs (link opens in new window)