JournalOnline General Forum
This is an open forum for your views on any legal topic. Use the box after a contribution to post a comment, or email a submission to email@example.com
Letter: belief in the soul
9 Apr 18
Is it right that a doctor's letter should be given less weight if not "on soul and conscience"?
Looking at recent civil court reports, I am surprised to see that Sheriff Cubie decided [McCallion v Apache North Sea Ltd  SAC (Civ) 1] that whilst medical documentation provided to a court did not have to be “on soul and conscience”, nevertheless any such documentation which was not “on soul and conscience” might be afforded less weight. Clearly this cannot be right.
This would be the same as saying that evidence given by affirmation might be afforded less weight than evidence given on oath. To require a medical practitioner to certify any documents “on soul and conscience” is to require that individual to accept the existence of an immortal soul! Surely not.
Branislav Sudjic, Kirkcaldy